Similar, but with those you won't be able to fit the radiator because you couldn't get it past the inner threaded section, these were the ones I got https://amzn.eu/d/0hILBBLmLike these?
Similar, but with those you won't be able to fit the radiator because you couldn't get it past the inner threaded section, these were the ones I got https://amzn.eu/d/0hILBBLmLike these?
Not all the frames from AK are made exactly the same, much differences in quality and measurements.Chris, is this radiator supplied by AK Sportscars?
It would be great to do something similar. My radiator (from AK) is tight against the frame internally on both sides, so I don't have this option.
No my radiator is a cheap eBay one (still 3 cores though) at 1/5 of the price of the AK one I thought I'd give it a go, someone else on here is using it and says it works well (can't remember the thread though)Chris, is this radiator supplied by AK Sportscars?
It would be great to do something similar. My radiator (from AK) is tight against the frame internally on both sides, so I don't have this option.
I would agree with you, there is minimal stress forces forward of the Upper strut mount. The forward lower control arm mount would be the only localized point, even that has structure bracing to the other side.Hi @Jerry41 given that there are already cross braces at the suspension mounts I don't think this front section is load bearing at all, in fact looking at it I think this front section is only present to mount the radiator on to.
Obviously you're much further on with the build than I am so as always I could be wrong
My concern was that during hard cornering the chassis will flex slightly, having the radiator bolted directly to the chassis will mean that the radiator will also flex possibly causing stress fractures over time etc ... it might be ok thoughThanks Chris and Douglas,
I have had a look back at my pictures of chassis before panels and , yes, correct it does appear that the front frame is non structual so it should be ok for the rad mounting as i have it..
Jerry
and the Weight of the liquid inside de radiator which would be 8/9 kilogrammes in mouvementAnd the nose/pivots of the front clip are on the same structure
Over a bump in the road / hard cornering the weight of the body will also add to flexing moments.
I would definitely rubber mount
Not heard of any rad cracks in these types of chassis so you should be good with what you have done. More likely to get a stone thrown up making a hole! I cracked a windscreen on a hill climb once in a hairpin corner on a steep incline but the rad was unaffected.My concern was that during hard cornering the chassis will flex slightly, having the radiator bolted directly to the chassis will mean that the radiator will also flex possibly causing stress fractures over time etc ... it might be ok though
Hi Fred, yes I read this thread as part of my research, and my first approach was going to be creating a cradle similar to yours, but as I had a 10mm gap round the edge I thought I'd try the rubber bobbins.
looks like your getting along nicely Chris.
if you have them, offer up the fuel tanks as the float access holes dont line up with the fuel tank float apperatures.
now is the time to elongate them to allow access for removal / fit of float gauges.
I also suggested to Phil that an access opening and cover is made to allow access to the crank pulley bolt to allow engine to be turned over as its a pain trying to do it in gear and rocking car .
Jerry