A very powerful piece of writing by Bryan Forbes

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Here in the UK your children go to a school depending on where you live, Parents will tell fibs (a sort of lie that won't get you barred when it comes time to go to the pearly gates) and give false addresses just to get their children into better schools but now these parent will be prosecuted and even imprisoned. Meanwhile MPs such as Moran, Morley, and Smith have been shagging the heart out of the UK taxpayers moral and stealing money left right and centre and furthermore they will not be prosecuted. Wake up Parliament. Smell the coffee. Kellys report will be public this morning and the already revolting bunch of MPs we have brought upon ourselves will revolt even more I think. What a bunch of total shits.
 
Last edited:

Keith

Moderator
On Westminster Bridge which is East of the Houses of Parliament there are cast iron railings on the downriver side, which cast curious shadows when the morning sun strikes them.

The direction of said shadows point directly to the House of Commons.

This is a genuine photograph.

The Lord moves in mysterious ways...









ATT02076.jpg
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Keith , You could not make that up. Thats brilliant.

Political debate, argument , and ridicule is alive and well here in the Paddock. Who ever it was made the comment to Ron Earp that he would donate if the Paddock was censored - keep your frigging money but let me know how much you were going to send and I'll see if I can do something instead. If you are really honest - come out and say who you are. You will probably be ridiculed by others here but it's worth a go. If not, put a sock in it.
 
On Westminster Bridge which is East of the Houses of Parliament there are cast iron railings on the downriver side, which cast curious shadows when the morning sun strikes them.

The direction of said shadows point directly to the House of Commons.

This is a genuine photograph.

The Lord moves in mysterious ways...

ATT02076.jpg

Ha ha - I just managed to spit coffee over my laptop screen - :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Excellent find Keith.....
 

Keith

Moderator
I make no apologies for posting this as I think it most appropriate at this time. I have no idea of the origins of this piece and it could, of course apply to the many nations fighting on foreign soil...

P1.png

P2.png

P3.png

Picture6.png
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
I really feel that I am able to guage the patriotic sentiment amongs our members and I really feel you are each loyal to the flag in your countries. What has this got to do with remembrance day here in the UK ? My wife is just sitting reading the Times and suddenly shrieked at me "Did you know that Shell have banned the poppy appeal this year?". I really think you guys should know about this. For those outside the UK we have a system where you toss some coin in a collection box in just about every retail outlet in the UK. In return, if you want to, you get a flower shaped paper poppy which you can wear in your lapel/collar. It really is no big deal and costs nothing to the companies doing it - it's a simple charity and the 'poppys' are made by disabled ex servicemen. Last year, the British Legion who organise the whole thing raised £31,000,000 to distribute amongs service (military) charities. I think most of us Brits do it evey year and most are proud of the British Legion.

Fuck Shell. I will run out of fuel and walk before I ever fill up with Shell fuel again.

Veterans to boycott Shell after ban on forecourt poppy sales - Times Online

Another soldier died today -
 
Last edited:

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
One cannot conceive of such incompetency.

Article from: The courier Mail.
November 08, 2009 11:00pm

<!-- Split page --><!-- Lead Content Panel -->HUNDREDS of thousands of dollars worth of new Army packs and webbing were junked after the equipment failed during pre-deployment training.
One field pack was so heavy and cumbersome that it could not even be dropped during contact with enemy, potentially placing Diggers' lives in danger.
The heavy pack and the extreme weight of an old model of body armour made it almost impossible for soldiers to move quickly during a fire fight.
Despite arduous field testing before the gear was bought, once it was issued to troops for so-called mission rehearsal training it failed miserably.
According to documents obtained by The Courier-Mail, one unit called Combat Team Spear from the 2nd Battalion's Charlie Company registered 187 complaints about the equipment, known as the Individual Combat Load Carrying Equipment, during their training session.
The complaints, known in the military as Reports on Unsatisfactory or Defence Material or RODUMs, focused on the weight of the field pack, faulty clips and pouches that did not fit the required number of ammunition magazines.
Such was the extent of the problem that commanders allowed soldiers to buy their own load-carrying equipment and 90 per cent took up the offer.
Soldiers have since spent hundreds of dollars on their own webbing and were angered recently when the brass issued a directive banning certain non-issued ammunition pouches that hundreds of soldiers had bought.
The heavy field pack was dropped altogether and the unit was issued with a lighter pack that could not carry as much gear.
In its official publications the army boasted that the gear "employs signature management technology, making it significantly more difficult to see through night vision equipment".
Given that the Taliban does not use night vision gear the Diggers would have preferred a webbing system that actually worked.
After numerous complaints from soldiers the military is also replacing heavy combat body armour with a lighter version at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The problems with the gear prompted a senior official in the purchasing area to ask exactly what the soldiers did during the two-year field evaluation phase.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Unfortunately such incompetency is rife.
Here is an example I had to suffer. When the Nimrod first came into the R.A.F. the
man that designed the galley - a four seat dinette, a hot cup unit, a water boiler and a couple of cupboards - thought that with twelve men on the crew he should order a toaster that could toast twelve slices in one go. The connector for this thing was quite large and the socket for it was above the table in the dinette and it occupied /monopolised nearly all of the table in the dinette. Well, firstly we did not want a toaster period, and when you switched this thing on, the lights in the centre section of the aeroplane went dim. If heated up so much it was like a furnace and could not be left unattended. We sent it back with a comment that if we had to have a toaster, then a two slice model would suffice and for about two months
we were quite content at having no toaster. Then a box arrived with paperwork stating this was the replacement toaster. The groundcrew took the box, unpacked it and put it on the aeroplane. We were tasked with an early slot (on the Nimrod that meant an 0200hrs briefing) and off we went - with the replacement toaster. Well, it wasn't really a replacement - it was the same one with a sheet of Zintac riveted over ten of the bread slots leaving two and the wiring frigged about so only two would heat up. It was still just as big. We landed in Cyprus and asked the caterers to take it away - ostensibly for cleaning - and lose it. It was still on the inventory for that aeroplane when I left the squadron a year or two later. That probably cost the taxpayer north of £10k in 1971. Nothing has changed - nobody asks the guys at the coal face what works and what doesn't.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
A short time ago I was part of a petition to the Prime Minister about the repatriation of soldiers remains killed in Northern Ireland. The current practise is for the remains to be placed in an Air Transportable Casket and returned to the UK as commercial freight on the airline operating hold freight on that route. This is a preposterous
state of affairs and totally undignified. Here is some of the correspondence:

“We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to change the rules regarding Ramp Ceremonies for HM Forces Personnel killed by an act of terror, while in the Service of Her Majesty the Queen.”
Details of Petition:
“The bodies of the soldiers Murdered in Northern Ireland were flown home without ceremony. This has angered members of HM Forces: “British troops have spoken of their anger following the disclosure that the bodies of the two soldiers murdered by dissident republicans were shipped back to the UK as freight.” “We have been told that the soldiers were not allowed to have a ramp service because of political reasons. We were told the Government didn’t want anything that would look like the Troubles had restarted. “As far as we are concerned these soldiers were shot dead in uniform by terrorists and they should be treated in exactly the same way as if they were killed in Afghanistan. To send their bodies back to the UK as freight is outrageous.” When a person joins any branch of HM Forces they are effectively on duty 24/7/365. The Government are asked to review the crass rules that allowed this to happen. The Government are further requested to amend the rules on Ramp Ceremonies.”
· Read the petition
· Petitions homepage
Read the Government’s response

The Government is immensely proud of all of our Armed Forces. Their dedication, professionalism and sacrifice is a justifiable source of inspiration to so many. Sapper Mark Quinsey and Sapper Patrick Azimkar, the two young men who tragically lost their lives in the attack at Massereene Barracks on 7 March 2009, were men of exactly this ilk. These young men had trained hard and were promising soldiers who had already achieved a good deal in their short careers. The loss of them was keenly felt by their colleagues and the grief felt by their families must be beyond measure. Our thoughts remain with them.
To mark this note repugnant, cowardly act a memorial service for Mark and Patrick was conducted at Massereene Barracks and attended by fellow members of the soldiers’ Regiment before their bodies were returned to the mainland. Each soldier was subsequently afforded a military funeral in accordance with the wishes of their families.
The policies and procedures that govern the repatriation of deceased Service personnel to the UK mainland are kept under constant review to ensure they reflect the needs of the bereaved families, the Services and the Nation. The policy was reviewed in May 2009 and amendments were made to ensure that all those who die on operations are afforded a ceremonial repatriation. However, no change was made to the policy for the movement of the bodies of deceased personnel within the United Kingdom, including Northern Ireland. Mark and Patrick were returned to the mainland in line with this policy and in the same manner as all Service men and women killed in Northern Ireland in the last 35 years.


Maybe now you can see why I get really hacked off with these total miscreants we mistakenly call a government.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Daily Telegraph Disclosure:

Ministry of Defence officials paid £47 million in bonuses

Civil servants at the Ministry of Defence have been paid £47 million in performance bonuses this year, it can be disclosed.



By Rebecca Lefort and James Kirkup
Published: 10:00PM GMT 11 Nov 2009

brit_soldier_afgha_1401835c.jpg
A total of 232 British service personnel have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001 Photo: EPA


The figure, which covers just the first seven months of the current financial year, has been revealed as the Government faces charges of failing to provide British troops with adequate support and equipment on the front line in Afghanistan.
Additional bonus payments for the rest of year could take the total above the £53 million paid out to MoD officials in 2008/09.
<!-- BEFORE ACI -->
Related Articles

There are 85,000 civil servants at the MoD, one for every two active troops. Around 50,000 of them will get a performance bonus this year.
The MoD has claimed that the bonuses would average less than £1,000, but some officials will get much bigger payments.
Last year, the department had senior 95 employees who were paid salaries of more than £100,000; and the average bonus for a senior civil servant in the department was £8,000.
An Army private can be paid as little as £16,681, with a £2,380 bonus for serving in Afghanistan.
The disclosures come as British troops are dying in Afghanistan at a rate not seen since the Falklands war, and polls show voters are turning against the mission.
A total of 232 British service personnel have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001. Commanders have said that some of those deaths could have been averted if there had been more helicopters available to British forces.
The MoD says that bonuses are paid to officials for exceptional performance, yet the department has faced repeated criticism over its mismanagement of major defence projects and its failure to deliver enough helicopters to Afghanistan.
The bonus payments have risen sharply even as MoD’s record has come in for growing criticism. In 2003/04, total bonus payments were £24.9 million.
The £47 million paid out so far this year would be pay for 47,000 sets of body armour, 26,111 SA80 A2 assault rifles or 156 Ridgeback armoured vehicles which help protect troops against roadside bombs.
Last night, as Gordon Brown continues to face intense pressure over his treatment of the Armed Forces. the bonus figures drew criticism of the Government.
The figures were revealed in the Commons following questions from Liam Fox, the Conservative shadow defence secretary, who said the bonus payments would anger service personnel.
"Many in the Armed Forces will be aghast that bonuses are being paid on the basis of outstanding performance," Dr Fox said. "This will only increase the view that the Armed Forces and the MoD administration are hugely out of balance."
Ministers awarded the Armed Forces a 2.8 per cent pay rise this year, meaning a private soldier is now paid between £16,681 and £25,887.
Soldiers deployed to Afghanistan receive a tax-free “operational allowance” worth £2,380 and a Longer Separation Allowance worth at least £1,194. The MoD says that means a private soldier deploying on his first operation is paid at least £20,255.
Earlier this year, The Daily Telegraph revealed that Britain has more military bureaucrats for every active serviceman than any of its allies.
Ministers have promised to cut the number of officials at the MoD head office by a quarter. The Conservatives say they will reduce MoD bureaucracy by a third.
Last month, an MoD review of defence procurement found that the department has overspent its equipment budget by £35 billion yet is still putting British troops on the frontline at risk by failing to provide the right kit
And earlier this month an independent inquiry found that years of incompentence and cost-cutting by MoD officials had contributed to the crash of an RAF Nimrod in Afghanistan in 2006, killing 14 British service personnel.
Earlier this week, Mr Brown was confronted by Jacqui Janes, whose son Jamie Janes died in Afghanistan last month. Mrs Janes told the Prime Minister that her son died because there was no helicopter available to take him to a field hospital. Mr Brown has promised a full investigation into the incident.
The widow of an RAF serviceman killed in Afghanistan last night criticised the Government over the equipment available to the troops. At the end of an inquest into the death of Senior Aircraftman Gary Thompson, 51, his widow Jacqui Thompson said British forces in Afghanistan are having to cope with “limited resources".
Reg Keys whose son, Lance Corporal Tom Keys, was once of six Royal Military Police killed in Iraq in June 2003, also criticised the MoD bonus awards.
He said: "They are trying to run the Armed Forces on a shoestring, but still pay their own employees huge bonuses."
Col Bob Stewart, the former commander of United Nations forces in Bosnia, said: “I am absolutely staggered. No civil servant should be getting any kind of a bonus when our country is broke and our troops are fighting for their lives.”
An MOD spokesman said: “These pay awards are met from within salary budget and have no impact on the operational or equipment budget. The awards were given to around 50,000 civil servants resulting in an average payment of less than £1,000.
“The vast majority of these awards were paid in August as part of previously agreed pay deals, so we are not expecting this year's total to increase significantly.”
Britain has 9,000 troops in Afghanistan, and Mr Brown has authorised the deployment of another 500.
President Barack Obama is also considering a military request for another 40,000 US troops. The request was made in September, and the president’s delay has caused frustration in the British government.
In the House of Commons yesterday, Mr Brown said that Mr Obama would make an announcement on troops “in the next few days.”
But the White House insisted that the decision is still "weeks and not days" away.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Again from the Telegraph:



Soldiers deserve bonuses as much as civil servants



By Con Coughlin Defence Last updated: November 12th, 2009
17 Comments Comment on this article

There is something deeply wrong at the heart of our government if we can find the funds to reward MOD civil servants for performing their jobs to a satisfactory level, but not doing the same for the thousands of soldiers, sailors and airmen who daily risk their lives in defence of the realm.
I personally have no objection to civil servants receiving bonuses for hitting their performance targets, although I can see why there has been an outcry over the scale of the awards paid out at the MOD so far this year given the mess the department has made of getting the right equipment to our troops at the right time in the three years since our forces deployed to Helmand in 2006. Then there is the tricky issue of the billions of pounds that have been wasted because of the MOD’s highly inefficient procurement system.
But what concerns me more is the inherent unfairness of rewarding one group of employees and not another. Many of our young soldiers – the ones who have to go eyeball to eyeball with the Taliban – earn less than a traffic warden, as General Sir Richard Dannatt, the recently retired head of the British Army, pointed out.
And if they are unfortunate enough to get horribly maimed by a roadside bomb, they then find their civilian counterparts in the MOD challenging how much compensation they should receive for having their lives ruined in the service of their country.
If we can pay bonuses to the civil servants, then we should do the same for all our brave service men and women who risk their lives to defend our freedom and security.
Now that would be a popular election pledge for one of our political parties come the general election.
compensation
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Now, the new Speaker of the House of Commons has shown himself to be completely out of tune with the sentiments of the average man. The Telegraph has disclosed he has spent more than twice the national average income on the apartment he lives in and charged it to who? You and me. Again where will this stop.
Here is the article:

Speaker John Bercow's official residence refurbished for £45,000

The Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, has had his grace-and-favour Westminster apartment refurbished at a cost of £45,000 to the taxpayer.



<!-- Make sure there is no whitespoace at the end of the bline -->By Robert Winnett, Deputy Political Editor
Published: 10:00PM GMT 13 Nov 2009

theBercows_1521818c.jpg
John Bercow with wife Sally Photo: PA


Mr Bercow ordered the makeover, covering work from child-friendly redecorating to new televisions and furniture, within weeks of his election as Speaker in June.
His wife, Sally, oversaw most of the work and the couple pushed ahead with the overhaul despite being warned by Parliamentary officials that the costs may be seen as excessive.
<!-- BEFORE ACI -->
Related Articles

Emails reveal that Mrs Bercow compiled a lengthy “shopping list” of items that she wished to have changed in the Speaker’s historic official residence within days of her husband’s election.
The new documents, released under Freedom of Information laws, also disclose that Mr Bercow has spent almost £13,000 on entertaining and hospitality - including a three-night trip to Rome costing almost £4,000 - in just three months.
Mr Bercow had faced criticism over his use of expenses when he was a backbench Conservative MP, claiming the maximum amount permissible to fund another Westminster flat.
The new disclosures about Mr Bercow's spending are likely to prove embarrassing for the new Speaker who was elected on a promise to restore trust in Parliament in the wake of the MPs' expenses scandal.
During his campaign to become speaker, he said: “It is high time the House (of Commons) was run by professionals on a transparent basis, ensuring that we are accountable to the people who put us here.”
Michael Martin, his predecessor as speaker, had been criticised for his use of taxpayers’ money, including extensive renovations of the speaker’s official residence which ran to more than £700,000.
After succeeding him, Mr Bercow vowed to modernise Parliament and make it “accountable to the people” and transparent in its operation.
He pledged to surrender the MP's second homes allowance worth more than £24,000. However, the new documents disclose, he has already ordered renovations on his new Westminster appartment worth more.
In August, the Speaker admitted that he spent just over £20,000 on refurbishing his official apartment before moving in with his wife and children.
However, documents have now revealed how the true cost was actually £45,581, as Commons officials agreed to account for extensive redecoration and other work as 'routine maintenance' which Mr Bercow did not declare publicly.
Mr Bercow is expected to be under pressure to release a breakdown of the work conducted as 'routine maintenance'.
Emails show how Mrs Bercow, who last week declared her desire to become a Labour councillor in Westminster, communicated with Parliamentary officials over the refurbishment requirements.
“The existing wall paper is very office/board-roomy,” she wrote on June 30th.. “So, if at all possible, can the walls be redecorated.
“Can the TV be replaced with a larger one and moved into a more central location (like it or not, it will be a focal point for the kids!!!),” she continued. “I assume it will have SKY and we’ll need a DVD player too if possible.”
The work – initially estimated to have cost £23,400 by July 8th - had almost doubled in price by the end of the same month.
The emails show that Commons officials were becoming concerned about the spiralling cost of the work. However, they agreed to allow the Bercows to continue with the renovations.
One official wrote on July 1st: “My concern is that the list is getting longer, which isn’t technically a problem, but I know that you are very mindful of the costs and only wish to do what is considered as ‘reasonable’.
“The latest version [of the renovations spreadsheet] has everything included and I think that the best way to view it, is as a shopping/wish list. If any costs come out as excessive…we can always review the options and make the necessary decisions.”
An email discloses that the £45,000 cost of the work was split into two spreadsheets before the lower £20,000 figure was released in August.
Any redecorating which had not been done for at least five years was described as the 'routine maintenance' and excluded.
However, it can also be revealed how the costs of this routine maintenance doubled between an estimate in early July of £11,500 and the final cost of £24,922 just three weeks later.
A source close to the Speaker said that most of the extra work was to parts of the official residence which are not used as the family’s private living quarters.
He said that the £20,000 figure which had been released originally represented the additional cost to the taxpayer of the Speaker being someone with children.
“We tried to isolate the costs to the taxpayer of Mr Bercow and his family moving in,” he said. “A lot of the other work is beyond the control of the Speaker and is determined by English Heritage and other bodies.
“Mr Bercow has no plans to do anything, this is a one off.”
The new Speaker has also spent £12,812 on entertaining and official functions during his first three months. This is far higher than the amounts spent by Lord Martin of Springburn during his final three years in office.
Mr Bercow’s entertainment costs include £3,599 on a three night trip to Rome to attend a G8 Speaker’s conference. He was accompanied by three other people whose identities are not disclosed in the released documents but are thought to be officials.
He is the second youngest Speaker in history and the first in living memory to have three young children – Oliver, Freddie and Jemima, who are all under six.
The official speaker's residence is underneath Big Ben in the Palace of Westminster. It was designed by Charles Barry and contains a state dining room and a canopied bed to be slept in by the monarch on the night before a coronation.
Mr Bercow has previously said that much of the renovation work was necessary to make the apartment child-friendly. For example, locks had to be fitted to the windows for the safety of his young children.
He previously lived in another flat in Westminster which was also funded by the taxpayer. He repaid almost £8,000 earlier this year after The Daily Telegraph raised questions about his lawful avoidance of capital-gains tax on the sale of two properties.
However, Mr Bercow is thought to have refused to surrender his gold-plated pension – which guarantees to pay half his income when he retires regardless of how long he remains in the job. As he is only currently aged 46, this is a very valuable perk.
In an interview to be broadcast on Sunday, Mr Bercow will defend his wife’s right to stand as a Labour candidate in next year’s council elections.
But he acknowledged that he could expect the mother of his three children to be portrayed as “a cross between Jerry Hall, Lady Macbeth and Eva Peron” because of her decision to get involved in electoral politics.
“My wife isn't my chattel, she's my wife,” he will say on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show.
“She is a private citizen who has her own views and is an independent person. And it has long been known that my wife is a supporter of the Labour Party, so I don't think there's anything odd, embarrassing and certainly there's nothing underhand about it.”
II
In the UK ? Please don't do 'nothing' about this . Protest to your own MP in as loud a voice you can muster and write in an angry vein insisting your MP passes your sentiments to the PM.
Will all this ever end ? They, the Members of Parliament are still controlling their own budgets and ripping the arse out of everything we hold as fiscally virtuous. What do we tell our children in years to come ? THAT WE DID NOTHING ?? Please write and do it now.


 
Last edited:

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Current proposals for the R.A.F. is to cut 10,000 staff and close five operational bases. Additionally Short-term cuts will see reductions in the RAF’s flying schedule, the grounding of Nimrod MR2 aircraft and Puma helicopters until April, and the mothballing of four of its seven Boeing E-3D Sentry Awacs airborne warning aircraft.
Allegedly, the R.A.F is now about half the size of British Airways.

Grounding the Nimrod MR2? About time. I think they should park one on top of the M.O.D. building in Whitehall which will serve as a reminder about all the lies and spin that was told after the 2006 accident which took the lives of fourteen crew.
Instead, now they've paid themselves bonuses. When questioned about their bonuses, they explained it came out of a salary budget and not an operational equipment budget.
Get a life and smell the coffee ! Who pays for these Budgets? Answers on a postcard please.......
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Back again with more political news. Nothing to do with racing cars, GT40s or snap on what evers. You are not compelled to read this (espescially if you are the one doing the winging !).
In the Telegraph, one of the main (serious) UK news paper that has been doing all the exposing on Members of Parliament fiddling the expenses to boost their incomes, is a report about
possible criminal proceedings againsy these miscreants we call MPs. I think and I hope their will be more prosecutions.
Here is the article :
MPs' expenses: fraud charges for six MPs and lords

Six MPs and peers are facing criminal charges of fraud following investigations by Scotland Yard into the abuse of the parliamentary expenses system, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.



By Robert Winnett and Richard Edwards
Published: 8:00AM GMT 19 Nov 2009

MPsexpenses_1526015c.jpg
Clockwise from top left: Lord Clarke of Hampstead, Baroness Uddin, Lord Hanningfield, Elliot Morley, David Chaytor, Jim Devine


Detectives will pass files imminently on the Labour MPs Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Jim Devine, and peers Baroness Uddin, Lord Hanningfield and Lord Clarke of Hampstead to the Crown Prosecution Service, Westminster sources have said.
Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, is expected to decide whether to prosecute the politicians as early as January, before a general election.
<!-- BEFORE ACI -->
Related Articles

Mr Starmer will determine whether the politicians face court on counts of fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, or false accounting, for which the maximum penalty is seven years.
Police and criminal lawyers are confident that charges will be brought.
A team of detectives has been assessing and investigating cases for five months since the Telegraph’s Expenses Files investigation disclosed widespread abuse of parliamentary allowances.
They are now on the verge of finalising their files to send to prosecutors.
A Westminster source said: “We have heard that things are about to come to a head”. A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service said that they had not yet received files, but it is understood that they are expected imminently.
Police have been liaising with Sir Thomas Legg, who is carrying out an audit of MPs’ expenses, and are believed to have taken witness statements from senior civil servants and members of the Fees Office who processed the suspected claims.
Witnesses, including constituency workers and banking officials, have also been interviewed as detectives build up a file of evidence.
Officers who specialise in financial investigations have carried out a low-profile inquiry, with no arrests. It is believed that MPs and peers have co-operated with requests for emails and bank statements.
The most serious suspected frauds are considered to be those of Mr Morley and Mr Chaytor who both claimed thousands of pounds for “phantom” mortgages they had paid off.
Mr Morley, the former agriculture minister, claimed more than £16,000 for a mortgage that did not exist and also admitted claiming £20,000 for mortgage capital repayments in contravention of the rules. Mr Chaytor admitted an “unforgivable error” in “accounting procedures” when claiming almost £13,000 in interest for a mortgage that he had paid off.
Police have also investigated why the Bury North MP also claimed almost £5,000 in office allowances to pay his daughter, Sarah, under an assumed name.
Mr Devine, a Scottish Labour MP, submitted invoices for electrical work worth £2,157 from a company with an allegedly fake address and an invalid VAT number.
Lord Hanningfield, the Conservative peer who is also leader of Essex County Council, claimed £100,000 over seven years for staying in London despite living 46 miles from the capital. He has been investigated over whether he was returning to his home in Essex while claiming “overnight allowances’’.
Lord Clarke, a former Labour Party chairman, admitted his “terrible error” in a newspaper interview after claiming up to £18,000 a year for overnight subsistence when he often stayed with friends in London or returned home to St Albans, Herts.
Baroness Uddin allegedly claimed £100,000 in allowances by registering as her main home a property in Maidstone, Kent, that was apparently barely occupied.
MPs Shahid Malik and Tony McNulty will face no further action over their expenses claims and police have ruled out criminal investigations into the practices of “flipping” or avoiding capital gains tax.
They have also decided not to pursue charges of misconduct in public office against any of the politicians, following the failed investigations into the “cash for honours” scandal and the Damian Green leak inquiry, it is understood.
There are fears at Westminster than any potential charges would overshadow an election campaign, although both Gordon Brown and David Cameron have said they expect prosecutions.
Even if the MPs and peers are charged in January, it is unlikely that any trial would start before 2011.
Mr Devine and Mr Chaytor denied last night that they had been formally questioned by police. Lord Clarke refused to comment.
Mr Morley said: “I have always made it clear that I am not guilty of any offence and that I am very happy to co-operate with the police, and the parliamentary authorities and procedures.
I have been advised not to comment on press reports particularly when they are based more on speculation than fact.”
Baroness Uddin and Lord Hanningfield were unavailable for comment.
A Metropolitan Police spokesman refused to comment.
Last month it emerged that HM Revenue and Customs had launched inquiries into 27 MPs.
MPs could avoid tax on expenses claims on the basis that they were “wholly, necessarily and exclusively’’ incurred in relation to the performance of their parliamentary duties.
Those found to have claimed for non-essential items could now face a tax bill of up to 40 per cent on their value, plus interest and fines.
In May, HMRC wrote to all MPs asking if they wished to make voluntary payments. The authorities said last night that they had opened formal inquiries into 27.
It is thought that they are also scrutinising MPs who avoided capital gains tax when selling second homes; those who claimed for personal tax advice; and some travel claims.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
What goes round comes round. It could not happen to a nicer (not) person.
She can talk herself out of anything but lets see how this tart gets out of this one.
I was in the same departure lounge as her a couple of years ago on a tech delayed flight. She figured she was so precious and should be treated accordingly - I felt like throwing up.

Harriet Harman to be prosecuted over 'mobile phone car smash'


<SCRIPT src="http://scripts.dailymail.co.uk/js/diggthis.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 7:24 PM on 19th November 2009

article-1229340-0744F95F000005DC-153_233x586.jpg
Harman's smile at the Queen's Speech yesterday may fade after she learns that she's facing driving charges

Labour's deputy leader Harriet Harman faces prosecution for her involvement in a car smash in which she allegedly used her mobile phone, the Crown Prosecution Service said tonight.
A court summons will be served on the MP for Camberwell and Peckham after a police investigation into the crash in Dulwich, south-east London on the afternoon of July 3.

Ms Harman, 59, is facing charges of driving without due care and attention and driving while using a hand-held mobile telephone, the CPS said.
Both of these offences are summary only so can only be tried in a magistrates’ court.

A CPS statement said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service has decided there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to prosecute the Rt Hon Harriet Harman MP for the offences of driving without due care and attention and driving whilst using a hand-held mobile telephone in relation to an incident on 3 July 2009 in Peckham, London.

'The Metropolitan Police Service provided papers to the CPS on 9 November 2009 which were reviewed by the Special Crime Division in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors.

'An MPS employee will now attend a magistrates' court in order to obtain a summons to be served on Ms Harman.'
Ms Harman is said to have collided with a car parked at the side of the road.
She is alleged to have stopped briefly after the crash, but witnesses say she then drove off without leaving her insurance or registration details.

A spokeswoman for the MP said: 'Ms Harman strongly refutes the allegations and will deny the charges.'
If found guilty, Ms Harman faces fines of up to £6000, could have penalty points imposed on her driving licence, and a court could ban her from driving.

article-1229340-07491450000005DC-910_468x286.jpg
Harman with her Ford Fiesta. She allegedly collided with a parked car while talking on her mobile phone

However, publicity surrounding the prosecution itself is likely to be of the greatest concern for Harman, generating embarrassment as Labour prepares for national parliamentary elections due by June 2010.

The Conservatives are predicted to win the election, with polls putting them well ahead of Labour.

The law banning motorists from using hand-held phones while driving was introduced by the Labour government in 2003.

Prosecutors have even argued that those found guilty of the offence should be jailed.








Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229340/Harriet-Harman-prosecuted-driving-using-mobile-phone.html#ixzz0XKsHRRM9
 
Back
Top