Climate change

Official UK Government position.

You signed a petition asking the Prime Minister to " suspend the Climate
Research Unit at the University of East Anglia from preparation of any
Government Climate Statistics until the various allegations have been fully
investigated by an independent body."

The Prime Minister's Office has responded to that petition and you can view
it here:

UEACRU - epetition response | Number10.gov.uk
 

Keith

Moderator
Classic New Labour Spin! Answer to a petition criticising the handling of the Climate Change Science and the Govt turn it into a bloody press release for Global Warming!

That's it, I've had enough of their bull shit. I will never sign another one but will find other ways (he says ominously) of registering my increasing dissatisfaction with this bunch of half wits ...

In any event, it was probably written by a junior clerk. That's the contempt they show us.

:thumbsdown:
 

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
We should feel good that Global Warming has been debunked, but we don't. Why? Because developed world Governments are moving at full speed as if GW fraud never occurred!
America through it's EPA head Lisa Jackson, declared CO2 a dangerous pollutant.
The Rudd Government is pursuing it's ETS Tax despite the senate knocking it back twice.
Obama has proposed a a new climate change agency within the Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration with all it's attendant bureaucracy regulation and costs.
The EU is proceeding quickly with carbon tax and regulation plans. As is the U.K.
These Governments have ignored the Climate change fraud and are proceeding to roll out Taxes and regulations. Why? FOLLOW THE MONEY!
Senator James Inhofe, has called this "the greatest scientific scandal of our generation" and called for Al Gore to re-testify before the Senate to depend IPCC'S "work of fiction", which Gore unreservedly endorsed.
Watch the Democrats defeat that request.
 
Last edited:

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
Can't get it done one way. We'll try another. In other words we don't care how congress votes.



Obama mulls carbon-trading shortcut

<!-- Class 'push-0' just right-aligns the element so that the main content comes first. --><!-- cT-storyDetails --><CITE>March 16, 2010</CITE> <BOD>The Obama administration is considering a carbon-trading system under existing law if the US Congress doesn't pass cap-and-trade legislation that allows companies to buy and sell the right to pollute, a US Environmental Protection Agency official said.
The existing Clean Air Act ''could enable us to include emissions trading'' within agency regulations aimed at reducing carbon dioxide and other gases that scientists have linked to climate change, Anna Marie Wood, a senior policy analyst at the EPA, said at an event in Washington hosted by the American Bar Association.
''We're considering all that right now and thinking about what might make sense,'' Wood said. While the agency ''strongly prefers'' that Congress pass new laws dealing with greenhouse gases, ''we think that there's a lot of progress that can be made using certain tools under the Clean Air Act.''
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said last week the agency has no plans to independently set up a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases. Jackson said she believed Congress will establish a national program. Cap-and-trade legislation that narrowly passed the House last year is stalled in the Senate.
'Source performance standards'
Emissions trading for greenhouse gases might be set up under part of the Clean Air Act that lets the agency set ''new source performance standards'' for large polluters such as power plants, oil refineries and cement plants, Wood said.
The EPA's authority over greenhouse gases stems from a 2007 Supreme Court decision on the scope of the Clean Air Act. The agency's Feb. 1 budget request, which is subject to congressional approval, includes $US7.5 million ($8.2 million) to examine new source performance standards for greenhouse gases that include ``market-oriented mechanisms.''
The budget request showed the EPA's interest in carbon trading under existing law and there are ''continuing signals from the agency that they're looking at this and evaluating this internally,'' Allan Bedwell, a vice president at CantorCO2e, the emission markets unit of Cantor Fitzgerald LP, said in a telephone interview.
'Any way it can'
If Congress doesn't pass a cap-and-trade bill this year, it's likely that the EPA will try ''any way it can to reduce emissions in a cost-effective way'' using the existing Clean Air Act, Bedwell said.
''Emissions trading is one of the most cost-effective approaches,'' Bedwell said.
Considering a program doesn't mean the EPA has decided to set one up, Raymond Ludwiszewski, a Washington-based partner at law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a former EPA general counsel under President George H.W. Bush.
''I'm confident that they haven't decided exactly how they're going to do everything,'' Ludwiszewski said.
The agency's deliberations are complicated by its failure under President George W. Bush to set up a cap-and-trade program for mercury emissions and amend the rules of existing trading systems for acid rain and smog pollution rights, he said.
When legislation with these amendments to the Clean Air Act stalled in Congress, the Bush administration tried to make the changes through agency regulations. In 2008, a federal appeals court said in two separate cases that those regulations overstepped the bounds of the existing Clean Air Act and overturned them.
Judicial review
The EPA under President Barack Obama isn't likely to set up an emissions trading system for greenhouse gases under existing law that can ''survive judicial review,'' Ludwiszewski said.
''It will be very difficult for the administrator to find tools that will allow cap-and-trade approaches to regulating greenhouse gases under the current Clean Air Act,'' he said.
So far, the EPA has proposed greenhouse gas regulations that would toughen fuel economy standards for new cars and trucks and require new and modified industrial polluters, such as power plants, to install the ``best available'' technology to limit emissions.
There has been ''no final decision'' on greenhouse gas regulations ''beyond what EPA has previously announced,'' Brendan Gilfillan, a spokesman for the agency, said in an e-mail.
'Careful thought, discussion'
The agency will be busy getting the already announced regulatory programs started and a decision on whether to pursue emissions trading will probably be made ''further down the road,'' Jonathan Cannon, a University of Virginia School of Law professor and former EPA general counsel during the Clinton administration, said in a telephone interview.
While the EPA can make a good case for carbon trading under the existing Clean Air Act, a final decision still ''requires a lot of careful thought and discussion between the lawyers and the program people who would be designing such a scheme,'' Cannon said.
A ''cautious and responsible approach'' by EPA officials today will help the agency fend off court challenges from groups that oppose any future carbon trading regulation, he said.
''The stakes are big, and when the stakes are big, these issues get litigated, even if there's a fairly small chance of success,'' Cannon said.
 

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
“Gambling our Future

<DIV align=center><B><I><FONT color=#984806><FONT face=Arial>on Sunbeams and Sea Breezes”<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
P><P align=center><DIV align=center><B><I><FONT color=
www.carbon-sense.com
 

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
TOM Smitheringale wanted to prove the world was warming. Now he's another alarmist with frostbite. <!-- google_ad_section_end(name=story_introduction) -->

<!-- // .story-intro --><!-- google_ad_section_start(name=story_body, weight=high) -->The 40-year-old from Perth planned to be the first Australian to trek unassisted to the North Pole, but announced he'd raise some consciousness along the way.
As he wrote on his website: "Part of the reason Tom's One Man Epic is taking place now is because of the effect that global warming is having on the polar ice caps."
Indeed, he wanted to see the North Pole while it was still there: "Some scientists have even estimated that the polar ice cap will have entirely melted away by 2014!"
But Antarctica isn't melting away, and Arctic ice has slowly increased since its big low in 1997.
But no one seems to have told Tom, who soon found his extremities freezing.


<!-- google_ad_section_start(name=story_related, weight=medium) -->Related Coverage



<!-- // .story-sidebar -->Two weeks ago he nearly called off his trek after suffering excruciating pain in his fingers and thumbs, forcing him to call in emergency help.
And last week he had to be rescued by Canadian soldiers after falling through the ice sheet.
"(I) came very close to the grave," he said, on being flown out.
This is actually now the fourth year running that warming alarmists have had to be rescued from expeditions to prove the Arctic is warmer than it actually is. It's a metaphor.
Last year it was British eco-explorer Pen Hadow and his two-person team who had to be flown out mid-stunt, after battling brutal sub-zero weather conditions that gave the team's photographer frostbite.
The year before, eco-adventurer Lewis Gordon Pugh was similarly thwarted.
He'd planned to kayak 1200km to the North Pole to raise awareness of how global warming had allegedly melted the ice sheet so badly that scientists warned the North Pole that summer could be ice-free.
No such luck. Pugh had to pull out, still 1000km from the finish, when a great barrier of sea ice blocked his route.
The year before gave even more farcical entertainment.
"Explorers and educators" Ann Bancroft and Liv Arnesen said they were off on what reporters described as "a historic 75-day expedition to the North Pole and beyond to raise awareness of global warming's impact on the fragile Arctic".
It turned out that what was fragile was not the Arctic but the alarmists, who had to call off their big trip not long after it started, when Arnesen suffered frostbite in three of her toes, and extreme cold drained their batteries.
Explained a spokesman: "They were experiencing temperatures that weren't expected with global warming."
Like the globe, really.
The fact is that when Arctic rescuers must save more people from global warming stunts than from global warming itself, it's time to heed again the words of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
"We have nothing to fear but fear itself." So if alarmists settled down, they might just live longer, and keep their toes.
And the rest of us might not be put to so much needless expense. Like rescues, for instance
 
Good post Pete.

I was talking to s friend in the states and she heard but did not remember the source that the volcanic erruption may/will heal the ozone hole. That would certainly throw a zinger to the alarmists.
 

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
nsidc_n_timeseries_0330101_thumb.jpg

Steven Goddard and Anthony Watts:
Barring an about face by nature or adjustments, it appears that for the first time since 2001, Arctic Sea ice will hit the “normal” line as defined by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) for this time of year.


..............................................................................................................

It’s one of the IPCC most popular scare-claims:

And 20 million drowning Bangaldeshis was an underestimation, according to Al Gore in An Inconvenient Truth:
Worse still, Calcutta, and to the east Bangladesh, the area covered includes 50 million people. Think of the impact of a couple of hundred thousand refugees when they are displaced by an environmental event and then imagine the impact of a 100 million or more.
But a new study by Bangladeshi scientists accuses the IPCC of alarmism, saying the deposit of sediment will counter much of the effects of any rising seas:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), already under fire for errors in the 2007 report, had said a one-metre (three-foot) rise in sea levels would flood 17 percent of Bangladesh and create 20 million refugees by 2050.,,,
But IPCC’s prediction did not take into account the one billion tonnes of sediment carried by Himalayan rivers into Bangladesh every year, which are crucial in countering rises in sea levels, the study funded by the Asian Development Bank said.
“Sediments have been shaping Bangladesh’s coast for thousands of years,” said Maminul Haque Sarker, director of the Dhaka-based Center for Environment and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), who led research for the study.,,,
Even if sea levels rise a maximum one metre in line with the IPCC’s 2007 predictions, the new study indicates most of Bangladesh’s coastline will remain intact, said Sarker
 
Last edited:

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter

cid:851A9EFCB5A44620BD3B16186BA0082A@rona6zl95bde1y
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
P><DIV><DIV><P style=
For all of you out there in America and across the globe who have fought so hard to tackle the hideous enemy of our planet, namely carbon emissions, that bogus god you worship named "Climate Change" or "Global Warming", there is some really bad news that will be very painful for you to process. But it is my duty to pass it on to you anyway. <o:p></o:p>
</DIV></DIV>Are you sitting down?<o:p></o:p>

Okay, here's the bombshell. The current volcanic eruption going on in Iceland, since it first started spewing volcanic ash a week ago, has, to this point, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet. Not only that, this single act of God has added emissions to the earth estimated to be 42 times more than can be corrected by the extreme human regulations proposed for annual reductions.<o:p></o:p>

I know, I know.... (have a group hug)...it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving your Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up til midnight to finish your kid's "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, going on vacation to a city park instead of Yosemite, nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your $1 light bulbs with $10 light bulbs ...well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just the past week.<o:p></o:p>

The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in the past week has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And, those hundreds of thousands of American jobs you helped move to Asia with expensive emissions demands on businesses.. . you know, the ones that are creating even more emissions than when they were creating American jobs, well that must seem really worthwhile now.<o:p></o:p>

I'm so sorry. And I do wish that there was some kind of a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud but the fact of the matter is that the brush fire season across the western U.S.A. will start in about two months and those fires will negate your efforts to reduce carbon emissions in our world for the next two years.<o:p></o:p>

So, grab a Coke, give the world a hug, and have a nice day!
 
Back
Top