Al, Wyld,
Your posts show that neither of you have any idea what I or the vasy majority of the Country are saying.
You continue to defend the un-defensable................
You are a manipulative twit. Violence is defensible when it has a purpose that isn't evil, ignorant or bigoted...you would let a cop shoot a bad guy who was threatening your life, right? You would let a soldier fight to protect your way of life, right? You might fight to protect your freedom...naw, I forgot...you enjoy the freedom that others provide via violence, but you won't partake of it yourself.
Part of a post by Wyld
Yes I am opposed to violence. You are for violence?
I am opposed to violence meant to hurt the innocent, repress a dissenting view or further a vile cause. Any other form of violence is acceptable, which is posited by those who build consensus with you...otherwise police officers wouldn't have guns, we wouldn't have a military and we wouldn't watch boxing.
Wyld, so far the only thing you have said that makes any sense is "....the availablitiy of guns in America is a crime" (direct quote from Wyld) Good for you!
Wow, thank you Jimmy...I'm so glad that you continue to twist my words to suit your purposes without actually comprehending the spirit with which they were intended AND that you approve of something I've said. I can die a complete man, knowing that Jimmy-boy gave me approval...because your opinion matters like no-one elses.
I will now give it a rest.