Doc Watson
Lifetime Supporter
'lowest drag body I can fit over myself ' .... try this?!?!
He had everything backwards! Only weenies go feet first!it has been tried:
So, turning Left, the RF wheel would be in Negative Camber and the LF wheel in Positive Camber?I wonder if a better ( project specific ) solution might be to move the front/steering wheels on a positive/negative camber arc, this would have the effct of widening the front axle to the outboard tire when under corner loads ( just like a bike when you lean into the corner. )
I'm guessing Ackerman could probably be ignored given the narrow tires and lack of low radius turns?So, turning Left, the RF wheel would be in Negative Camber and the LF wheel in Positive Camber?
If so, it would seem the track width would not necessarily change - rather it would shift to the right of chassis centerline.
Ackerman must be in play here somehow and I can’t wrap my head around that this morning..
Possibly - but I have to wonder if it is wise to ignore Ackerman since the primary use of Ackerman is to increase traction in turns.I'm guessing Ackerman could probably be ignored given the narrow tires and lack of low radius turns?
Correct on all counts... weight and any induced downforce ( really its centrapental? force, might have to dig out your old principles of flight ). Since the inside wheel has less induced load that is transfered to the now wider-shifted outboard RH tire contact patch the RF wheel thinks it is on a wider axle. Ackerman is still very important as Too much or Too little will induce more scrub/drag and slow the racer down. A simple way to test the theory might be to place a prone board on a ten speed bike & head down hill. In the video's the rear wheel looks to be ready to snap into oversteer at a moments notice so similar mods to the rear might help as well.So, turning Left, the RF wheel would be in Negative Camber and the LF wheel in Positive Camber?
If so, it would seem the track width would not necessarily change - rather it would shift to the right of chassis centerline.
Ackerman must be in play here somehow and I can’t wrap my head around that this morning..
I'm guessing Ackerman could probably be ignored given the narrow tires and lack of low radius turns?
Post #13 on this thread. Have you ever tried a run down one of the courses on a Bike to see how much it has to lean to negotiate the course?? No cheating, dont use the brake!Figured out the rear suspension today using an old front unit off the GT, meanwhile the front end is being held off the stops by bungy cords (for now). I did roll it out for the first time to see it beyond the constraints of the shop. I think it's off to a good start:
![]()
Triangulation is coming, just wanted to get through the layout first. Also a roll hoop, brakes and steering.
On the geometry discussion, I don't lose sleep over Ackerman due to the minimal amount of lock we use during the event. With the camber I have built in, the outer wheel does tip inward as more lock is applied, but not by a massive amount.
Jac- What video are you referring to? One of the derby cars?