Jeff Young
GT40s Supporter
Some very good points made here... I'm actually PROUD of the Paddock right now!
So Jeff, I think we are on the same wavelength regarding Vietnam - but I did not want to stray too far off the topic of Syria. My point was to draw a potential parallel to what may well happen in Syria which happened in Vietnam. Where was our ally France in 1955? Where were we and how the phuq did we get there? I spent some of the most miserable days of my life there, fighting a war that was not a war. Fighting along side of people who thought that the very reason their families were being killed off was because we (USA) were there...
Wnners of the week were judged by land held and body counts. It was miserable and I, for one, wish that we would let people fight their own battles with weapons of their own construction.
Jack, thanks.
Randy, absolutely we agree on the basic idea that we were driven by the wrong motivation in going there, and the wrong goals when we got there, trying to impose a government on the South Vietnamese that for the most part they did not want.
Just to clarify, the French realized this. They fought the First Indochina War from 46-54, realized it was unwinnable and got out, to deal with bigger problems in their backyard in Algeria. After 54, if we had simply recognized Ho to be the nationalist he was, and let him and the country have the elections they wanted, we would have been done with it.
Instead, we painted Ho as a communist and acted like he was the second coming of Stalin. Ho's no hero, but he wasn't Stalin either.
I remain very afraid that if we look at the Islamic world the same way, meaning "Muslim bad, non-Muslim good" like we did with communism, we will make the same mistakes we did in the Cold War in choosing who to support, and who not to support.