There was a claim in a thread here a little while ago that the world's first synchro sequential gearbox was in use. I am prompted to ask several questions;
1. My very basic understanding of sequential gearboxes is that they are inherently more likely to shift cleanly than an H-pattern box, so is synchro really necessary?
2. What kind of difference does sequential shifting make to the packaging of a gearbox compared with H-pattern?
3. Does the shifting method change the capacity of the gearbox in any way, including reliability?
4. In this era of electronically controlled shifting, are we likely to see manual sequential boxes widely used on road or are we more likely to get an electronic manual?
5. Aside from Gearfox, has anybody actually made one, and is it available?
My interest is primarily technical, and clearly I've never used a sequential dog box, but it might help somebody out there with a concept.
1. My very basic understanding of sequential gearboxes is that they are inherently more likely to shift cleanly than an H-pattern box, so is synchro really necessary?
2. What kind of difference does sequential shifting make to the packaging of a gearbox compared with H-pattern?
3. Does the shifting method change the capacity of the gearbox in any way, including reliability?
4. In this era of electronically controlled shifting, are we likely to see manual sequential boxes widely used on road or are we more likely to get an electronic manual?
5. Aside from Gearfox, has anybody actually made one, and is it available?
My interest is primarily technical, and clearly I've never used a sequential dog box, but it might help somebody out there with a concept.