You know, Al, there's a pretty good chance that the majority of those who voted for BO, as well as those who will vote for HC, did or will do so because they agreed with their candidate's policies, felt them to be knowledgeable, and believed in their ability to do a better job of leading this country than the Bozo who gave it his best and failed miserably prior to the election.
Now, I will in all honesty say that I understand why you might feel that way...it has to do with your peer group. There's a pretty good chance that almost, if not all, of them feel the way you do, so it's reasonable to believe that since the majority of your peer group is so cohesive in their beliefs the rest of the country's voters do, too. I bet you were flabbergasted when Romney lost, too.
I encountered the same phenomenon when I was in education. The majority of the teachers have advanced degrees, and when one's peer group is so similar in cognitive/conceptual skills it becomes your defacto "average"... Well, it isn't, as I found out completing cognitive evaluations for 26 years. In fact, you would be surprised how "dumb" the average group really is. Most likely they are the ones who can't figure out how to make change at the McDonald's drive-through...and statistically the "normal" population comprises 68% of our population.
So...don't believe for a minute that your peer group represents the majority of the population...OR that they share your opinion of the present political leadership.
The far-right is statistically as well represented in our population as is the far left...and both groups added together do not equal the number in the center of the bell curve.
Cheers!!
Doug