No ire here Larry, but I have to ask Doug, if you find Jack's post persuasive, it does beg the question as to why your own FBI would say that greater than 94% of terrorist acts on US soil, from 1980 until 2008, are attributed to non-Muslim groups. In Europe the authorities say that, up until 2013, greater than 98% of terrorist acts on their patch are attributable to non-Muslim groups?
I would guess that the average US citizen has not heard of the majority of these, but consider ETA, FARC, Shining Path, CIRA, RIRA, Golden Dawn, FLNC, and the many dozens of other recognised terrorist groups that plague Europe, Africa, the US, India, Myanmar, Japan, South America, and a heap of other countries. None of them are Muslim. The middle bit of Jack's post under "Think of it" is not correct. There are conflicts between all manner of religious groups everywhere.
Ask yourself, how much coverage does the media give terrorist acts by non-muslims? Very, very little. That does not mean they do not occur. Hell, in the US you have more chance of being shot by a fellow American than you have of falling victim to a Muslim terrorist, but for some reason, that is acceptable.
And before anyone starts tarring me with the "Liberal" brush, as I have said on more than one occasion here, I have little interest in politics. However, if you really wanted to label me, I voted for NZ's current government, which is slightly right of centre, so I guess that put me in the conservative camp. Just my 2c worth.