Gulf Oil Rig Disaster

A comment from Dick Morris. I know some of think that to revive a sinking career, he had to get involved with a prostitute. But his boss wasn't so dissimilar.


OBAMA'S BIG OIL SPILL BUNGLE

By DICK MORRIS

Published on TheHill.com on June 29, 2010

Printer-Friendly Version

It's one thing to say that Obama's administration showed ineptitude and mismanagement in its handling of the Gulf oil spill. It is quite another to grasp the situation up close, as I did during a recent visit to Alabama.

According to state disaster relief officials, Alabama conceived a plan -- early on -- to erect huge booms offshore to shield the approximately 200 miles of the state's coastline from oil. Rather than install the relatively light and shallow booms in use elsewhere, the state (with assistance from the Coast Guard) canvassed the world and located enough huge, heavy booms -- some weighing tons and seven meters high -- to guard their coast.

But...no sooner were the booms in place than the Coast Guard, perhaps under pressure from the public comments of James Carville, uprooted them and moved them to guard the Louisiana coastline instead.

So Alabama decided on a backup plan. It would buy snare booms to catch the oil as it began to wash up on the beaches.

But...the Fish and Wildlife Administration vetoed the plan, saying it would endanger sea turtles that nest on the beaches.

So Alabama -- ever resourceful -- decided to hire 400 workers to patrol the beaches in person, scooping up oil that had washed ashore.

But...OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) refused to allow them to work more than 20 minutes out of every hour and required an hourlong break after 40 minutes of work, so the cleanup proceeded at a very slow pace.

The short answer is that every agency -- each with its own particular bureaucratic agenda -- was able to veto each aspect of any plan to fight the spill, with the unintended consequence that nothing stopped the oil from destroying hundreds of miles of wetlands, habitats, beaches, fisheries and recreational facilities.

Where was the president? Why did he not intervene in these and countless other bureaucratic controversies to force a focus on the oil, not on the turtles and other incidental concerns?

According to Alabama Gov. Bob Riley, the administration's "lack of ability has become transparent" in its handling of the oil spill. He notes that one stellar exception has been Obama aide Valerie Jarrett, without whom, he says, nothing whatever would have gotten done.

Eventually, the state stopped listening to federal agencies and just has gone ahead and given funds directly to the local folks fighting the spill rather than paying attention to the directives of the Unified Command. Apparently, there is a world of difference between the competence of the Coast Guard and the superb and efficient regular Navy and military.

Now the greatest crisis of all looms on the horizon as hurricanes sweep into the Gulf. Should one hit offshore, it will destroy all the booms that have been placed to stop the oil from reaching shore. And there are no more booms anywhere in the world, according to Alabama disaster relief officials. "There is no more inventory of booms anywhere on earth," one told me in despair.

The political impact of this incompetence has only just begun to be felt. While administration operatives are flying high after a week in which the president's ratings rebounded to 49 percent, per Rasmussen, after his firing of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the oil is still gushing and the situation is about to worsen.

The obvious fact is that Obama has no executive experience, nor do any of his top advisers. Without a clear mandate from the top, needed efforts to salvage the situation are repeatedly stymied by well-meaning bureaucrats strictly following the letter of their agency policy and federal law. The result, ironically, of their determined efforts to protect the environment has been the greatest environmental disaster in history. But some turtles are OK!
 
A comment from Dick Morris. I know some of think that to revive a sinking career, he had to get involved with a prostitute. But his boss wasn't so dissimilar.


OBAMA'S BIG OIL SPILL BUNGLE

By DICK MORRIS

Published on TheHill.com on June 29, 2010

Printer-Friendly Version

It's one thing to say that Obama's administration showed ineptitude and mismanagement in its handling of the Gulf oil spill. It is quite another to grasp the situation up close, as I did during a recent visit to Alabama.

According to state disaster relief officials, Alabama conceived a plan -- early on -- to erect huge booms offshore to shield the approximately 200 miles of the state's coastline from oil. Rather than install the relatively light and shallow booms in use elsewhere, the state (with assistance from the Coast Guard) canvassed the world and located enough huge, heavy booms -- some weighing tons and seven meters high -- to guard their coast.

But...no sooner were the booms in place than the Coast Guard, perhaps under pressure from the public comments of James Carville, uprooted them and moved them to guard the Louisiana coastline instead.

So Alabama decided on a backup plan. It would buy snare booms to catch the oil as it began to wash up on the beaches.

But...the Fish and Wildlife Administration vetoed the plan, saying it would endanger sea turtles that nest on the beaches.

So Alabama -- ever resourceful -- decided to hire 400 workers to patrol the beaches in person, scooping up oil that had washed ashore.

But...OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) refused to allow them to work more than 20 minutes out of every hour and required an hourlong break after 40 minutes of work, so the cleanup proceeded at a very slow pace.

The short answer is that every agency -- each with its own particular bureaucratic agenda -- was able to veto each aspect of any plan to fight the spill, with the unintended consequence that nothing stopped the oil from destroying hundreds of miles of wetlands, habitats, beaches, fisheries and recreational facilities.

Where was the president? Why did he not intervene in these and countless other bureaucratic controversies to force a focus on the oil, not on the turtles and other incidental concerns?

According to Alabama Gov. Bob Riley, the administration's "lack of ability has become transparent" in its handling of the oil spill. He notes that one stellar exception has been Obama aide Valerie Jarrett, without whom, he says, nothing whatever would have gotten done.

Eventually, the state stopped listening to federal agencies and just has gone ahead and given funds directly to the local folks fighting the spill rather than paying attention to the directives of the Unified Command. Apparently, there is a world of difference between the competence of the Coast Guard and the superb and efficient regular Navy and military.

Now the greatest crisis of all looms on the horizon as hurricanes sweep into the Gulf. Should one hit offshore, it will destroy all the booms that have been placed to stop the oil from reaching shore. And there are no more booms anywhere in the world, according to Alabama disaster relief officials. "There is no more inventory of booms anywhere on earth," one told me in despair.

The political impact of this incompetence has only just begun to be felt. While administration operatives are flying high after a week in which the president's ratings rebounded to 49 percent, per Rasmussen, after his firing of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the oil is still gushing and the situation is about to worsen.

The obvious fact is that Obama has no executive experience, nor do any of his top advisers. Without a clear mandate from the top, needed efforts to salvage the situation are repeatedly stymied by well-meaning bureaucrats strictly following the letter of their agency policy and federal law. The result, ironically, of their determined efforts to protect the environment has been the greatest environmental disaster in history. But some turtles are OK!
 

Keith

Moderator
If true, that is very scary.

What would have happened in the event of a Nuclear Strike?

One thing is certain, of all the Hollywood and TV disaster movies that have come out of the USA (and there have been many) it seems the first reaction of the populace is to build barricades and load guns.

The survivalists in the hills, who have been planning for this scenario for many years emerge as triumphant rulers, and federal Agents everywhere are the Enemy.

So, it's true then.. Life does Imitate Art.
 
Like I said, its an opinion. But two UK friends told me on Saturday past that their opinion of BHO has changed. One is from a Jamacian family and his comment is: BHO is a talker. The other one called him a prat for blaming BP for the problem. The second one didn't really understand the problem very well. But his attitude on the president changed.
 
Sure we had lots of arguments about BHO, and they re-formed their opinion based on how he has handled the Gulf Crisis, and blamed BP.
 
Boy the government has been really quick about circling the oil leak and showing the utmost in co-operation in preventing the oil from reaching land.
 

Jim Craik

Lifetime Supporter
Boy the government has been really quick about circling the oil leak and showing the utmost in co-operation in preventing the oil from reaching land.<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Domtoni

Domtoni, yesterday I was painting and I spilled some paint, is it the Governments job to clean it up for me?
 

Keith

Moderator
Jim, I suppose that really depends on whether you've been specifically trained in the technical aspects of paint recovery, have a current State Health & Safety Certificate, produce a Method Statement acceptable to the EPA, can guarantee a "green disposal" solution, are not depriving immigrants of a job and are willing to indemnify the State against consequential damage, plant trauma etc and finally accept (in writing) that notwithstanding anything to the contrary, you accept that the State and Federal Government have the right to prosecute you for being a Polluter with no Statue of Limitations applying, even to your heirs.

Have a nice day.. :laugh:
 
All the government had to do was suspend the Jones law, protecting union jobs, and bring in the foreign skimmers. If I was BP I would fight tooth and nail against absorbing that clean up cost when the beaucrats dragged their feet for over 70 days.
 

Jim Craik

Lifetime Supporter
Domtoni

Domtoni, yesterday I was painting and I spilled some paint, is it the Governments job to clean it up for me?<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
 

Keith

Moderator
I'm afraid you're in for another shock mate, well, probably not shocking given the economics of the mad house we seem to indulge in these days.

BP is a massive global company and makes vast profits which is necessary to fund exploration and research.

Almost the entire cost of this spill is going to be set against their rather large corporate tax liability. As the company is registered (presumably) in the UK this will mean a significant shortfall in Government income, which given the current rate of cut backs in public services and increased taxation could mean... er, we pay.

Even if the burden doesn't all fall on the UK taxpayer, it will certainly not fall on BP. Not their fault, just the way it works these days..
 

Doug S.

The protoplasm may be 72, but the spirit is 32!
Lifetime Supporter
Even if the burden doesn't all fall on the UK taxpayer, it will certainly not fall on BP. Not their fault, just the way it works these days..

Right, Keith! Just the cost of doing business. Comes off the top when figuring profit and/or loss....and, therefore, taxes.

The stockholders will probably see diminished dividends, though....that is, assuming BP doesn't suspend the dividends altogether, but I can't see how they could do that unless their bottom line is red in color.

Doug
 

Ian Anderson

Lifetime Supporter
Right, Keith! Just the cost of doing business. Comes off the top when figuring profit and/or loss....and, therefore, taxes.

The stockholders will probably see diminished dividends, though....that is, assuming BP doesn't suspend the dividends altogether, but I can't see how they could do that unless their bottom line is red in color.

Doug

Not quite

The cost of clean up recapping etc will be shown on the income statement as an extradordinary item. and this will reduce net profit before Tax

By reducing the net profit you decrease the amount of tax payable ( about 1/3 of the profit will be corporation tax)

IF the total cost exceeds the profit before the extraordinary item then a net loss happens - in the UK you can then claim back the tax paid on this value -(Like taking last year and this year together and only paying tax on overall profit)

Ian
 
Back
Top