<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Roaring Forties:
"...The manual is very detailed as it should be and I do not sell them because of the high level of intelectual content (I have already had some of my parts copied)..."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Okay, I'm confused. I thought that "intellectual property" was defined as any product of the human intellect that is unique, novel, not immediately apparent, and usually related to an idea, invention, expression or literary creation, a unique name, a business method, an industrial process, a chemical formula, a computer program process, or a presentation that has some value in the marketplace.
Maybe an assembly manual is a literary creation, and it would fall under that part of the 'intellectual property,' but if it's a work on paper, then it's absolutely copyrightable and subject to protection under Title 17 of the U.S. code.
I'm not saying this to start an argument of any kind, but I fail to see how keeping the one really important part of making a decision about buying a GT40 - "Can I build it?" a secret is ever a good idea for any manufacturer. If you're that concerned about your manual, then you should copyright it. Not only will that protect your creative work, but it will allow you to sell your manual to people who are interested in purchasing a GT40, but don't know if they have the skill set to do so. Extra income never hurt anyone.
How different is your GT40 assembly from, say, a GTD or a Tornado?
I'm sorry, I just think that if someone is going to make a decision to spend tens of thousands of dollars on something that could take up all of their garage and most of their free time, they should know what they're getting into. No amount of posting on a forum is every going to be a substitute for actual knowledge. You cannot make an informed decision without having all of the information.
Your pal,
Meat.