David Morton
Lifetime Supporter
Yes, an interesting and thought provoking read, but not a very stellar response from across the pond?
I would have thought that a rebuttal using a graph or two would have been ideal...
Wasn't that a very interesting read, and so well written that even I could understand the folly that is Americas politics.
john
Hmmmmmmmmm...one minute you condemn comments of a political nature made by those from "across the pond" - especially when/where American politics is concerned...and complain when none is forthcoming the next. :squint:
Yeeeew be a difficult bird to 'figger' out, Keith! :sad:
...I don't think this guy likes Americans much does he?
Jim, I use Ben Franklin's formula. Works well!
'Comes as no surprise, does it? As I've mentioned before, many in the world love to hate America and Americans...............until America and Americans are needed to bail their butts out with $$$s, military forces, disaster aid/assistance, or some combo thereof...all on our dime, of course.
And, no, I will not "walk that back". Anyone who reads the above knows what I stated is absolute gospel. Whether they'll actually admit it or not is quite another matter.
'Rant over...
I only ask these questions because the UK has been here before said:Keith, what about the UK role?
At the core of the current unpleasantness in Iraq, like Syria, was a consequence of World War One and of the infamous, in Arab eyes, agreement between Sir Mark Sykes and Francois-Georges Picot which led to the division of the former Ottoman Turkish domains by the two leading European powers, Britain and France. That agreement, now almost a century old, appears in tatters, as both countries are broken, exhausted by years of war and sectarian division for which there is no easy repair. All of this would not matter were it not for the fact that Islamic State has set as its goal the destruction of the century-old Sykes-Picot imperial diktat and its replacement by a Sunni caliphate stretching from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean.
If you look at the UK role in the Versailles Treaty or Chamberlain's surrender of Czechoslovakia with the Munich Agreement, arguably it has some accountability for the bloodshed of WW2.
History certainly would indicate there is plenty of blame to go around, and the U.S. certainly has it's share. They have an old saying here that suggests people in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks and perhaps the somewhat tedious read extolling the virtues of Mr. Putin's government has some credibility issues on it's face.
As far as the trappings of socialism, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need". So how's that new EU tax surcharge on the UK going? It's only fair that you share the prosperity right?
Have you ever looked at the possibility that there may be an element of truth in the criticism of the USA?
Surely America has indeed "bailed people's butts out" but at a price.
...what if the butt bailing was a consequence of a mess of US making in the first place?
It was never done for free...
Remind me of that, exactly, would you?
Keith, what about the UK role?
At the core of the current unpleasantness in Iraq, like Syria, was a consequence of World War One and of the infamous, in Arab eyes, agreement between Sir Mark Sykes and Francois-Georges Picot which led to the division of the former Ottoman Turkish domains by the two leading European powers, Britain and France. That agreement, now almost a century old, appears in tatters, as both countries are broken, exhausted by years of war and sectarian division for which there is no easy repair. All of this would not matter were it not for the fact that Islamic State has set as its goal the destruction of the century-old Sykes-Picot imperial diktat and its replacement by a Sunni caliphate stretching from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean.
If you look at the UK role in the Versailles Treaty or Chamberlain's surrender of Czechoslovakia with the Munich Agreement, arguably it has some accountability for the bloodshed of WW2.
History certainly would indicate there is plenty of blame to go around, and the U.S. certainly has it's share. They have an old saying here that suggests people in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks and perhaps the somewhat tedious read extolling the virtues of Mr. Putin's government has some credibility issues on it's face.
As far as the trappings of socialism, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need". So how's that new EU tax surcharge on the UK going? It's only fair that you share the prosperity right?
You know I think Putin is a very astute leader with the best interests of his country ( and himself ) at heart. Better than Obama and Abbott .