Pete McCluskey.
Lifetime Supporter
The ultra wealthy generally speaking also employ a lot of people and help create wealth.
Bill Gates is an example.
Bill Gates is an example.
The ultra wealthy generally speaking also employ a lot of people and help create wealth.
Bill Gates is an example.
The ultra wealthy generally speaking also employ a lot of people and help create wealth.
Bill Gates is an example.
Bill Gates is a good example of a responsible billionaire. He is now a great philanthropist and has done much good for people.
On the other hand Lewis Hamilton should be ashamed of himself. He was raised in a country that gave him everything he needed at taxpayers expense and as soon as he's got a load of dosh he buggers off to save money.
Thats just plain wrong. :furious:
Along with just about every other British F1 racing driver, so why pick on Lewis.
Mansell: Isle of Man
DC: Monoco
Lewis: Switzerland
JB: Monoco
Thats to name but a few.
A lot of these comments are politics of envy! If you look at the tax systems around the world, the really wealthy use the system to save themselves tax. Its legal, get used to it. I am part of middle England and I use the system to save myself tax. Its legal and I wish to have money I eanrt kept as my money. I suspect most posting on this forum also use tax rules quite legally to reduce their liability. Really poor people most likely don't like it that we do. It is just a matter of scale. If the system sucks then work to get it changed.
Another position I like to take is that the wealthy have a responsiblity to spend their money. It then filters down the chain helping everyone along the way. If they were just taxed to death the money goes into government and then gets badly spent by politicians. I would rather someone buys a big plane (or other luxuries) keeping people employed, making a company successful so that its shares support old folks pensions than a polictician setting up a new quango with the money for some weird group who go and recommend restrictions on trade etc etc.
It's not so much the politics of envy. I actually agree with your second paragraph to a large extent.
The biggest issue for me is that the reasonably well off pay a shit load of tax, and the super rich pay bugger all.
Domtoni has it spot on for Non Domiciles. We should have a similar system to the US whereby tax is still paid (to some degree)even if you live abroad.
THAT is the iniquity, not the fact that we don't all (to a greater or lesser degree) try to avoid tax if we can. If we search our hearts, then we are all at it, whether its bringing home too many ciggies from our holiday abroad, or offering your local builder cash to do a job to get him to reduce his prices.
Again, just to re-emphasise, I pay a fuck load of tax per year, but one of my clients who has buggered off abroad (based in Switzerland) pays sod all, and that is an unjust situation.
Graham.
It's not against the rules, as a customer, to pay cash to get a builder ( or any other service provider) to reduce his price. If he chooses not to declare it as income, then that is tax evasion, and he is committing and illegal act, but I, as the customer, have done nothing which is against the law.
If you knowingly pay a builder cash and that he will then not declare it, you are also breaking the law. Evidence to back this up will be the amount paid for the job caried out. If it is a typical days wage at a tax declaring builder level then less likley to be in trouble but if a at cheap price to boot, then you may well get done too.
Graham - Why don't you move to Switzerland?
Where we fall short in the US is in the area of tax upon the ultra-wealthy. We have a reasonably balanced progressive taxing scheme that leaves enough dollars in the pocket of the typical wage earner to still provide incentive to grow incomes, while at the same time generating a meaningful amount of federal tax to cover federal expenses. Where our current scheme lacks effectiveness is with incomes above $1.0M (the "ultra-wealthy"). While the current top rate approaches 40%, the effective rate of the ultra-wealthy is typically much, much lower because of sophistiated tax planning schemes - their effective rates are usually in the range of 10-20%. This, of course, puts the ultra-wealthy in a lower effective tax bracket than most earners with middle incomes ($50k-$100k) who typically cannot afford sophisticated tax planning.
My first job as a cpa 25 years ago was tax planning for the ultra-wealthy. I quickly realized that these folks spend a little on complex tax planning schemes and save an enormous amount of tax dollars thereby. Being able to move the effective rate upon the ultra-wealthy from 10-20% to 40% would solve any and all budgetary problems we presently have by a very, very wide margin.
Taxing the ultra-wealthy more effectively is a difficult sell because, of course, the ultra-wealthy are really the people in control in Washington D.C. They are able to stall any initiative through back channel means (lobbyists, campaign contributions, etc.) before it ever gets to be considered by congress or commented upon in the popular media. It's really pretty pathetic, and sign of exceedingly weak leadership in Congress
'Cos I'm not rich enough....yet....MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA![]()