I would point out that I have absolutely no idea who's right or wrong on this issue and I suspect I will never reach a value judgement such are the confusing messages, but I was just pointing out that in the article referred to, the researcher who judged that the loss of ice overall was much less than predicted and even compensated for by the growth in ancient snow forming ice, in the last sentence, trashed the original thesis that Antarctic Ice is still receding or will receded further.
So one asks, why post such a report which is clearly contradictory and doesn't actually support one side or the other. In fact a champion fence sitting thesis!
No doubt fat fees were involved... :shifty: