More USA political questions

Yes Sean, lets analyse the facts.

I'm sure you are aware, but you probably just forgot to mention that Presidents are not elected by the "popular vote", are they?

Presidents are elected by the Electoral College, in that vote, the only one that matters, the election results were

Obama..................332

Romney.................206

That is a LANDSLIDE of major porportions!

If votes elected Presidents we would not have been subjected to BushII, his wars and his debt!

And as far as all three braches of the Government................

More Americans voted for Democrtic House candidates than voted for Republican Candidates, thats a fact!

Yes due to several reasons including gerrymandering, Republicans do control the House (but not for much longer).

So lets recap, Democrats received more votes in all three branches of Government..............

Yet we have a Republican House who acts like they have a mandate, when in reality they do not even have a majority!

I see so a President does not need amajority, just a majority from the arcane electoral college, but for congress a majority does not count.

Pehaps because you are an urban elite you are unaware of how the other 48% think, They feel they are being dictated to, and thye are. That is why there is a secession movement in colorado.

When it comes to financial issues, and this current debate has morphed into one, 70% of those polled do not support rasing the debt and are concerned/alarmed by gov spending.

This never used to be a winner takes all place.

And yes I agree with you about Bush 2 and how he was elected. Not sure old Al would have handled 911, but putting that aside because its pure speculation...

I do agree that Carl Rove figured out how to win elections by polarsing the elctorate. It is with sorrow that i see dems who claim to be more enlightend than that folowing the same tactics and worse.

As someone who cares about the country, this polarisation leads me to be concerned about the future. When i hear name calling by dems I see they have gone intot he gutter. When I see a president vllifying the upper middle class to get elected, just as hitler villified a minoroity I reailsie this is not the America I knew. It behooves all of us to change that.
 

Doug S.

The protoplasm may be 72, but the spirit is 32!
Lifetime Supporter
You know I have heard enough that the Tea Party is at fault for all the US's problems. I am a Tea Party Member and we have had enough finger pointing. Anyone who enjoys pay more taxes or making others pay more "to make it fair" for those sitting on their couch playing games or using the taxpayers money to buy a mechanical bull or other bull-s//t is not right. 47% of Americans don't pay a dime in taxes because they either don't make enough or just don't care to. The rest have found or made loopholes so they don't have to pay taxes. GE Netted 5B last year and paid not one penny in taxes and in fact got government subsides to add to their bottom line.

Gotta love the way you love to wince words, Marc. At the risk of being abraisive (not that you mind doing so), I call BS on your comments. Those who have found loopholes are the wealthy who can afford "dancing horses", and the large corporations like GE....and who managed to get favorable tax laws for themselves because of their affluence and influence. Wouldn't you like to see GE divvy up some of that $5B they received last year?

And the TEA party is a bunch of radical right wingers....anyone who says elsewise ought to look at who is pointing fingers these days....you'll find that the vast majority of TEA Partiers are the ones pointing fingers, or at least those who the TEA party has in their pocket, like Boehner. Are the TEA partiers trying to reach a resolution or just belly-aching and talking bullshirt? I suspect that they are enjoying both. I'm tired of their bullying and so are the vast majority of Americans...you're a very vocal minority, but the voting public is the "silent majority" and they spoke loud and clear in the last election...let's hope they speak even louder in the next election and get rid of the obstructionist Republicans altogether. I sure would like to see this TEA party issue be the Republican Party's Waterloo!!!!!

Time for more reasonable actions and less big talk....find a way to resolve the problems at hand instead of being the anchor on the boat.

Don't like what I said? I don't expect you to, but like the other radical right wing TEA Partiers, you're so blinded by your distrust and dislike for our government that you can't see the forest for the trees. You all ought to be ashamed.

No cheers for the TEA party, oh, no!!!

Doug
 

Jim Craik

Lifetime Supporter
Welcome back Doug, I really missed your posts!

I find it interesting that Sean worries about "polarisation", thats rich comming from a tea party member.

I remember after Obama was first elected, even before he took office, the tea party went on a "dont retreat, re-load, impeach the President Elect", suceed from the Union campaign, even before he took office.......No polarisation there!

Just good Americans trying to overthrow the will of the people.

Then to prove he is a hypocrite he polarizes and name calls in one sentance equating Obama to Hitler.

Hitler, really?

Just a good American worried about polarization!

Real classy!
 
Last edited:
Lets see Tea party members are on average people in their mid 30's with young families. They are not copoarte anything. The tea party is the group helping the taxpaying middle and upper middle class, the poeple tha actualy pays the taxes. As far as I can see big buisness is well in there with obaba. In fact look at wall, street, goldman gets a pass while a few small fry get fried for public consumption.

As to sitting down and solving things. Well who are you going to sit down with. A group of people who think debt does not matter when it comes to countries, a group of people who think free money is popular so you should do more of it.

I maintain we need balanced budget amendment and simpson bowles which was obababs own creation. The reason simpson bowels was like radiation is because the corps actualy would have had to pay their "fair share", and the unions would no longer have a free pass. So the Dems and republicans quitely by mutual comnsent filed it.

You know with a balanced budget amendment ans simpson bowels, taxpayers can breathe and political discource becomes about social issues not money.

Now the tea party may be radical, even off base, but they are saying however ineloquently that what is going on is wrong, and in that they are right.

Dont believe that either major party is better than the other, they are both part of the same machine, feeding off the citizenary and delivering grossly inefficiently. The argument between maistream dems and republicans is nothing more than talk show fodder to keep the populace sated.

Look at real estate prices in washington in the past 5 years, it defies gravity, I geuss some of those trillions stuck.

Dont stand on a soap box and be holier than thou. The dems are just as bad, wrapping themselvs in a veneer of good. Misguided as the tea party may be, they want the BS show to stop.

Maybe all rational thinkers here might considder getting rid of polarization and arguement for entertainemnt, and putting forward positive views on a way forward.

Ironicaly Paul Ryan of all people did this yesterday, and now we have a potential way through the impasee. Still whatever is agreed to will be marginal, debt ceilings will be raised and gov unrformed, all of which ulktimatly leads to greece. At least the Tea party is prepared to stand up and say its wrong, on this I wholeheartedly agree, as does 70% of the nation. Now lets see positive ways to make it right..
 
Welcome back Doug, I really missed your posts!

I find it interesting that Sean worries about "polarisation", thats rich comming from a tea party member.

I remember after Obama was first elected, even before he took office, the tea party went on a "dont retreat, re-load, impeach the President Elect", suceed from the Union campaign, even before he took office.......No polarisation there!

Just good Americans trying to overthrow the will of the people.

Then to prove he is a hypocrite he polarizes and name calls in one sentance equating Obama to Hitler.

Hitler, really?

Just a good American worried about polarization!

Real classy!

Firstly I have never even met a tea party member in person, I think its something out west, but if you want to paint me with that brush to feel good because your points are weak go ahead.

As to equating obabab with hitler, lets not forget before the war hitler was a master politician and manipulator of people. If you dont see the same thing happening now. My problem with dems is that like all leftists they are convinced that because they stand for "good" then end justifies the means. Righwingers think god spoke to them so whatver they want must be correct.

the rest of us rational human beings just get crushed between the two walls of idiocy.

I think both parties are FOS, if you want a competition as to who is worse that is a pretty poor standard. Who was it who said people get the government they deserve, what does that say about us.
 

Jim Craik

Lifetime Supporter
I am a Tea Party Member and we have had enough finger pointing. 47% of Americans don't pay a dime in taxes because they either don't make enough or just don't care to.

Pehaps because you are an urban elite you are unaware of how the other 48% think
Yea right, I'm an urban elite who works 12-14 hours a day.

Mark, that number is now 43% and declining.
 
Last edited:

Doug S.

The protoplasm may be 72, but the spirit is 32!
Lifetime Supporter
Welcome back Doug, I really missed your posts!

Geeez.....did my fingers really type THAT????? Must have been Dugly, my alter-ego :laugh:

Like I said, gotta love Marc's tendency to be forthright in what he believes...let's see if he'll take it as well as he gives it. Like I said, I don't expect to escape unflamed....:flameon:

Feelin' the love, Jim?

Cheers!

Doug
 

Doug S.

The protoplasm may be 72, but the spirit is 32!
Lifetime Supporter
My problem with dems is that like all leftists they are convinced that because they stand for "good" then end justifies the means. Righwingers think god spoke to them so whatver they want must be correct.

the rest of us rational human beings just get crushed between the two walls of idiocy.

I think both parties are FOS, if you want a competition as to who is worse that is a pretty poor standard. .

Sean, once again I'll take the opportunity for thanking you for your viewpoint. I've said it time and time again, it's a shame we have to vote for the lesser of two evils.....:cry:

Cheers!

Doug
 
Sean, once again I'll take the opportunity for thanking you for your viewpoint. I've said it time and time again, it's a shame we have to vote for the lesser of two evils.....:cry:

Cheers!

Doug


Thanks Doug

How about we all try put forward ideas as to how the country may positively move forward. Its not a magic wand as we have to accept the parties and yes even washington as they are. But maybe we can start here finding bridges and putting forward a philosophical outlook that makes everyone a little happy as opposed to all angry.

Since w eknow medicare and medicaid are the greatest threat how do we reform then, its going to have to happen, so how?

How do we get to a balanced budget, in way that does not require raising the 39% rate more. It cant be about always more money, it does not work, and it really does slow economic growth just like high interest rates do.

How do we get gov to take less$ and give more.

Frankly pretty much everyone I know couldnt give two hoots about who marries who, dont have issues with birth control, are non racist(to the extent conciously possible) like clean air and water etc. They aslo belive gov should spend what it reasonably takes in not more, and that ever increasing debt leads inevitably to disaster. That we help those that are down, but that many programs lead to depedndance and have undesired consequnces. That social upliftment comes from opportunity, that governement is necssary but needs to be appropriate not overwhelming. That there are no free lunches or rides, some people are luckier than others, that drive more than intelligence or education leads to sucess, that drive cant be taught, not everyone has it in equal measure or wants to, that free markets need regulation to prevent excess but that many rules stifel growth, that every dollar taken out of the economy by gov costs 5 in circulation.

So how do we try design such a system.
 

marc

Lifetime Supporter
Doug
(quote)Gotta love the way you love to wince words, Marc. At the risk of being abraisive (not that you mind doing so), I call BS on your comments. Those who have found loopholes are the wealthy who can afford "dancing horses", and the large corporations like GE....and who managed to get favorable tax laws for themselves because of their affluence and influence. Wouldn't you like to see GE divvy up some of that $5B they received last year?
I don't think that you understand that everyone should pay taxes that includes the wealthy. I am for a flat tax that only has a single loophole that incentives home ownership. That way local taxes can pay local govts to have police fire and schools, not to mention your trash picked up and your sewer take your waste away.
Since Corporations are considered an entity they should pay up like all of us do. Don't think that the Tea Party created this BS. This is done by Dems and Repubs, and I don't like it.
(quote)And the TEA party is a bunch of radical right wingers....anyone who says elsewise ought to look at who is pointing fingers these days....you'll find that the vast majority of TEA Partiers are the ones pointing fingers, or at least those who the TEA party has in their pocket, like Boehner. Are the TEA partiers trying to reach a resolution or just belly-aching and talking bullshirt? I suspect that they are enjoying both. I'm tired of their bullying and so are the vast majority of Americans...you're a very vocal minority, but the voting public is the "silent majority" and they spoke loud and clear in the last election...let's hope they speak even louder in the next election and get rid of the obstructionist Republicans altogether. I sure would like to see this TEA party issue be the Republican Party's Waterloo!!!!!
You are so full of bs that we are RADICAL. We want transperency, ethics in govt, lower taxes, no corruption, and a whole lot less spending. We give away money to every country, employ 1 in 10 people of the country in the government (all govt) or servicing the government and keep afloat govts that should have failed. Detroit, has no business getting a bailout because they have ruined their city with corruption and poor negotiation. And speaking of negotiation that is what Boehner is trying to do. Tea Party does not have deep pockets, we have phones, email, and letters that are communicating that we are not happy. The majority you speak of does not get off the couch unless its time to collect their welfare checks.

(quote)Time for more reasonable actions and less big talk....find a way to resolve the problems at hand instead of being the anchor on the boat.
Reasonable actions in your mind is raise the debt limit to be unlimited, pass a continuing resolution to keep blowing money and sink the boat. Negiotiation is just not happening because the Senate, Harry Reid, will not negotiate. P..Obama will not negotiate. The is not negotiating. When Obama called that Reps to the White House, what do you think happened? Obama said My way or the Highway. Sound like negotiation to you?
(quote)Don't like what I said? I don't expect you to, but like the other radical right wing TEA Partiers, you're so blinded by your distrust and dislike for our government that you can't see the forest for the trees. You all ought to be ashamed.
Radical, Extremeist, Nutters is all you got? Do you like paying more taxes? Do you like the fact that Obamacare has created a windfall for insurance companies by double or tripling healthcare costs and insurance? We let the govt take over the rails and it cost the taxpayers Trillions over the years. The postal service is losing money left and right and cannot meet its pension costs. The printing of money is another loss leader. Our military are scrapping brand new planes that are bought from other countries.
(quote)No cheers for the TEA party, oh, no!!!
Doug,
I would like to ask you and your democrat friends.
Do YOU want to pay more money for getting worse service?
Do You want to pay more money out of your pocket for more taxes?
Do You like paying for elected officials to make millions off lobbiests and get free healthcare at your expense for life?
Don't change the subject, answer the questions honestly and I think you will realize that you maybe an possible Tea Party member or a complete Utopian, Eliteist, Communist (understand what communism is before you rant).
Marc
 
Bottom line is the US needs to curb spending, import less foreign goods and raise taxes. At the moment each and every citizen owes the national debt over $50,000, no one can wave a magic wand over that figure and it wont go away. Some very unpopular vote losing choices will have to be made very soon. You can shout the odds on who is responsible for some or all of this but this is where you are today.
Our present government here in the uk have had to introduce austerity and many other unpopular choices to cover the wild spending days of a left wing government. They will probably just get the economy into shape for the next election by which time everyone will vote them out. And round we go again.:shout:

Bob
 
Bottom line is the US needs to curb spending, import less foreign goods and raise taxes. At the moment each and every citizen owes the national debt over $50,000, no one can wave a magic wand over that figure and it wont go away. Some very unpopular vote losing choices will have to be made very soon. You can shout the odds on who is responsible for some or all of this but this is where you are today.
Our present government here in the uk have had to introduce austerity and many other unpopular choices to cover the wild spending days of a left wing government. They will probably just get the economy into shape for the next election by which time everyone will vote them out. And round we go again.:shout:

Bob

I dont think w eneed to raise taxes. Maybe we need to get rid of loopholes and lower taxes. Imports are going down as we get more energy independant, something happening in spite of washington. As to the rest of imports. It seems foreign companies love manufacturing in the suth where there si less regulation and no restrictive union rules. BTW these plants pay the same as union plants and employees prefer not to have union.

What needs reformation is the tax code, something neither party wants to do because high taxes and loopholes create distortions and those distortions lobby to keep things as they are.

With a balaced budget and reformed tax code, pretty much everybody is going to do better because the economy will do better.
 
Doug
(quote)Gotta love the way you love to wince words, Marc. At the risk of being abraisive (not that you mind doing so), I call BS on your comments. Those who have found loopholes are the wealthy who can afford "dancing horses", and the large corporations like GE....and who managed to get favorable tax laws for themselves because of their affluence and influence. Wouldn't you like to see GE divvy up some of that $5B they received last year?
I don't think that you understand that everyone should pay taxes that includes the wealthy. I am for a flat tax that only has a single loophole that incentives home ownership. That way local taxes can pay local govts to have police fire and schools, not to mention your trash picked up and your sewer take your waste away.
Since Corporations are considered an entity they should pay up like all of us do. Don't think that the Tea Party created this BS. This is done by Dems and Repubs, and I don't like it.
(quote)And the TEA party is a bunch of radical right wingers....anyone who says elsewise ought to look at who is pointing fingers these days....you'll find that the vast majority of TEA Partiers are the ones pointing fingers, or at least those who the TEA party has in their pocket, like Boehner. Are the TEA partiers trying to reach a resolution or just belly-aching and talking bullshirt? I suspect that they are enjoying both. I'm tired of their bullying and so are the vast majority of Americans...you're a very vocal minority, but the voting public is the "silent majority" and they spoke loud and clear in the last election...let's hope they speak even louder in the next election and get rid of the obstructionist Republicans altogether. I sure would like to see this TEA party issue be the Republican Party's Waterloo!!!!!
You are so full of bs that we are RADICAL. We want transperency, ethics in govt, lower taxes, no corruption, and a whole lot less spending. We give away money to every country, employ 1 in 10 people of the country in the government (all govt) or servicing the government and keep afloat govts that should have failed. Detroit, has no business getting a bailout because they have ruined their city with corruption and poor negotiation. And speaking of negotiation that is what Boehner is trying to do. Tea Party does not have deep pockets, we have phones, email, and letters that are communicating that we are not happy. The majority you speak of does not get off the couch unless its time to collect their welfare checks.

(quote)Time for more reasonable actions and less big talk....find a way to resolve the problems at hand instead of being the anchor on the boat.
Reasonable actions in your mind is raise the debt limit to be unlimited, pass a continuing resolution to keep blowing money and sink the boat. Negiotiation is just not happening because the Senate, Harry Reid, will not negotiate. P..Obama will not negotiate. The is not negotiating. When Obama called that Reps to the White House, what do you think happened? Obama said My way or the Highway. Sound like negotiation to you?
(quote)Don't like what I said? I don't expect you to, but like the other radical right wing TEA Partiers, you're so blinded by your distrust and dislike for our government that you can't see the forest for the trees. You all ought to be ashamed.
Radical, Extremeist, Nutters is all you got? Do you like paying more taxes? Do you like the fact that Obamacare has created a windfall for insurance companies by double or tripling healthcare costs and insurance? We let the govt take over the rails and it cost the taxpayers Trillions over the years. The postal service is losing money left and right and cannot meet its pension costs. The printing of money is another loss leader. Our military are scrapping brand new planes that are bought from other countries.
(quote)No cheers for the TEA party, oh, no!!!
Doug,
I would like to ask you and your democrat friends.
Do YOU want to pay more money for getting worse service?
Do You want to pay more money out of your pocket for more taxes?
Do You like paying for elected officials to make millions off lobbiests and get free healthcare at your expense for life?
Don't change the subject, answer the questions honestly and I think you will realize that you maybe an possible Tea Party member or a complete Utopian, Eliteist, Communist (understand what communism is before you rant).
Marc

I am going to go out on a limb and say I pretty much agree with most everything said here. Except in reality he TEA party does not present or act that way. In addition if you have someone like Michelle Bachman potificating on your behalf its hard for a sentient being to take it seriously, or take seriously the people who elected someone like that.

There are two issues where I would take issue with what you said. The first is that the majority are not all on couch collecting welfare. The majority of the so called majority go to work and slog through from paycheck to paycheck.

What the so called suffering working majority fail to undertsand is that the only way to change that possibility is through a vibrant economy.. Now a government taxing small buisness and professionals to oblivion while letting corporations walk and handing out sweets to the medical and insurace industry will not make a vibrant economy, what it makes is a parasitical gov with some wealthy(who grow richer) feeding of the government teat. And is this regard the tea party is spot on.

On the same theme. peopole talk of opportunity like its an escalator or elevator somehting some people got on for free through good fortune and rode to the top. Maybe some inherited and did. But opportunity is actualy a long long flight of very narrow stairs that has to be laboriously climbed and negotiated. Not everyone is prepared to or even wants to make the full climb. Lack of opportunity is when the stairs are blocked. Ironicaly its Gov doing most of the stair blocking these days while promising an escalator ride.

The other area where I take issue with Tea party is on foreign policy. We are not nor should we be an isolationst country. We are not going back to the gold standard nor can we. Our wealth postr ww2 comes from international trade, having the dollar as the worlds reserve currency and being engaged. Without that we can go back to a 1930's semi depression agrarian state, and that is not going to happen.

But yes otheriwse you are right. Everyone should pay something, its easy to always raise taxes on someone else.. The loophole free ride for corps should be over. Loopholes gotta go. The insurace industry in cahoots with gov is bleeding us dry. And yes those of us who do pay taxes, the 45% who do, are fed up. We work we pay and we see it being wasted, and wasted by both parties.

Those who denigrate the tea party should also see that it is corretly tapping into a raw nerve. 99% of working families making more than 150k are not offshore loopholed, they pay a now 39% tax rate, another .9% for obaba care state payroll etc in the end they are left with 50% if they are lucky. Try running let alone growing a buisness when 50% is taken in good times, nothing is put back in bad and you and your family have to eat etc.

I looked the other day I have 4 employees we provide full medical, it costs $100k per year. Now I get my taxes raised and pay for obabab care too. Its funny because they said that we were subsidising the 30% who had no medical with higher premiums to cover hospital costs. So in theory Obabab care lowers premiums now that everyone is in, except that is not the case, we just get more taxes.

Now I will bet any of you $1000 that like every other gov program, 10 years from now obabab care will be in fiscal crisis, like medicare medicaid social security any military procurement you care to name, in fact like asnything gov does, this program will be in fiscal crisis and underfunded taking on the liabiliy of more debt, that is a certainty. And as anation we will be even less able to afford it. This si my logical rational objection to the whole thing.

I was talking to a feind in aAustralia, which really is a near socialst country. Their tax burden fed state equiv is lower. They pay 1.5% for full medical. In the Uk now the max tax rate is 45%. Here in real rate taking fed state soc security, obabab city etc its over 50% and close to 60% in califronia. The system is not working folks. I am all for providing medical within reason to everybody, what human is not. But another bloated program from a technicaly bankrupt state is surely not agood plan, especialy as its special interest loopholed giving billions to insurance comapanies lawyers and lobbyist.

The Tea party though needs to mature also, being represented by religious loonies is not the way. But yeah I do applaud people who do things because they remeber why they were elected, as opposed to all the other who do things to get elected again.

I would say that we ignore the tea party message at our peril. They will be elected again and grow, comming back to bite, but also their core economic gripe no matter how inarticulate is correct and the doom reality they forsee is not wrong. look at Greece and Spain It can and will happen here, only we are too big to bail out. Its excessive hubris to think we can go on as we are and the muisic will always play. Those who think that way are fooling us and themselvs, its maths in the end, and maths is cold and calculating, it does not play politics. I would likje to leave a healthy vibrant country for my chilldren and grandchilldren not a smouldering debt ridden heap.
 
Last edited:

Larry L.

Lifetime Supporter
The Tea party...what a bunch of radicals. What extremists. What anarchists. Whatloons, right? I mean, what else could one call a group of people who want LESS govt - not MORE? 'Who want a balanced budget and a end to huge govt debt and deficits. 'Who want government to adhere to the constitution? 'Who don't want to see a government 'handout' program for every group that demands one. Who want less regulation and fewer laws? 'Who work within the system to try to bring about the changes they want. I mean, really, how off the wall can some people be? The fools act and sound like another group of numbskulls who lived some 230+ years ago.

Naaaaaaaah, gimme a group of people who will physically take over public buildings OR private...people who love to block traffic for hours so working people have a deuce of a time getting to and from work. Gimme a group that'll gleefully vandalize and loot business...destroy property...'trash parks...'commit rape...'beat people up and shoot others. Gimme people who'll turn every inch of any area they take over into a trash dump and dope den...'people who'll use whatever unlawful tactic they can think of to affect the change they want. 'People who cost local government millions to clean up after. Gimme groups like the one Pelosi and other top liberals praised to the skies. What was that group's name again? Oh, yeah - "Occupy Wall Street"!" Now, by golly -THERE'S a group whose actions we can ALL be proud of and get behind. 'Truly America's finest, they are.

I think at this point it's time to 'bag' this thread and pop down to Florida for a 'toddy' with Jack. He'll have to buy though. After all, the "other guy" should always have to pick up my tab.
 
Last edited:
"I think at this point it's time to 'bag' this thread and pop down to Florida for a 'toddy' with Jack. He'll have to buy though. After all, the "other guy" should always have to pick up my tab".

I would happily comply!
 

Ian Anderson

Lifetime Supporter
I was talking to a feind in aAustralia, which really is a near socialst country. Their tax burden fed state equiv is lower. They pay 1.5% for full medical. In the Uk now the max tax rate is 45%. Here in real rate taking fed state soc security, obabab city etc its over 50% and close to 60% in califronia. The system is not working folks. I am all for providing medical within reason to everybody, what human is not. But another bloated program from a technicaly bankrupt state is surely not agood plan, especialy as its special interest loopholed giving billions to insurance comapanies lawyers and lobbyist.

.

Hi Sean
You are correct max tax rate on individuals is 45%
On top of that you also pay National insurance at about 12%
that takes your total tax rate closer to 57%
Your employer also pays National Insurance - at about 13% of employers gross wage
And once you have what remains of your wages you pay VAT on everything other than basic umprocessed food (Milk bread etc VAT free) Vat is currently 20%
And if you consider UK Fuel (Current price is £1.40 for a litre of diesel about US$2.24 per litre. About £0.82 of that is currently tax and duty (60%) seehttp://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-05-15/breakdown-of-the-petrol-price-at-uk-pumps/

Below is not 1005 accurate because there is an amount of lewerrate tax and tax free allowance required - but I'm not goig to calculate that

But if an employee is paid £10000 he will end up with a little over £3167 and the governmebt will get £7933


You Get Government Gets
Earn Monthly 10,000

Tax @ 45% -4,500 4,500
NI @ 12% -1,200 1,200
Employers NI 1,300


Take Home 4,300

Fuel for 2 cars 500 300

Balance 3,800

Amount After VAT 3,167 633

3,167 7,933
that is why the UK is trying to get to a balanced budget
I believe the equivalent numbers in USA will make a very different reading scenario

Ian
OK there are ways to decrease the tax bill if you own the company and take part as wages and part as dividends etc but as an employee of a corporation that is how it works in the UK!
Ouch!
 

Howard Jones

Supporter
OK I can't stand it anymore.

I agree we need more taxes!

The question is, how do we do that and actually receive more net revenue. The only way to do this is increase the size of the total economy. How do we do that. Put the available capital to work in the most efficient way possible and let it GROW.

The Tea Party is saying that the government isn't the most efficient way to put capital to work. It may very well be the LEAST efficient way to put capital to work. In fact by definition government SPENDING never, and I mean never, produces profit. It produces waste because there isn't a mandate to produce profit. The private sector on the other hands only mandate is to produce profit.

PROFIT IS GROWTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT WE NEED IS PROFIT, NOT WASTE!!!!!!!!!!! Or at least more of the former and less of the later.

Do I really need to tell what seam to be pretty smart people THAT!

We need to reduce the total tax burden on the total economy, or at least hold it level for a while while the rest of the available total capital GROWS. Thus solving our budget revenue imbalance problem and producing additional capital to begin paying down the debt.

It is as simple as that. Our country's problem is that nearly all of one party and a very big piece of the other refuse to acknowledge this simple truth because they perceive that it's not in the interest of their party to do so.

The Tea Party has put country before self interest and are trying to drag the rest of the Republicans along. If we succeed then we just may save America. If we fail then so does America.

By the way our revolution was suported by about 1/3 of the english living in north America at the time. A minority can effect great historic change. We know this and thats exactly what we are going to do.

Pretty simple decision for me, what side to chose to be on.

(See i wasn't mean to anybody)
 
Last edited:

Larry L.

Lifetime Supporter
"I think at this point it's time to 'bag' this thread and pop down to Florida for a 'toddy' with Jack. He'll have to buy though. After all, the "other guy" should always have to pick up my tab".

I would happily comply!

Are you sure? 'Cause, after all, my round-trip plane fare is the most 'spensive' part of that 'toddy' ya know...and then there's the hotel bill...an'.............



Howard:

Shuddup. We don't want an infusion of logic and common sense 'round here.

You 'kind' are soooooo annoying...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top