Why you stopped posting.

Jim, if I'm suspicious about the state of my battery, how many volts should it read at rest, when engine is running, when starting the engine? How many amps are being drawn when starting to indicate a healthy electrical system?

Would I use the AC or DC setting on my multimeter?
 
Jim, if I'm suspicious about the state of my battery, how many volts should it read at rest, when engine is running, when starting the engine? How many amps are being drawn when starting to indicate a healthy electrical system?

Bob,

A fully charged battery should read 12.6 volts

State of charge
12.68 v………100%
12.45…………75%
12.24v……….50%
12.06v……….25%
11.89v……….0%



The exact charging voltage will vary according to the battery state of charge, the load on the electrical system and the temperature. The “normal” charging voltage on a typical application might be 13.0-15.1 vat 77 degrees f but at -20 degrees f the charging voltage might be 14.9-15.8v. On a hot day with hot engine the charging voltage might drop to 13.5-14.3v
11.89v……….0%

When you crank the engine for starting expect the battery voltage to drop noticeably lower (hopefully not below 10 volts


With the engine idling and no load on the charging system (light and accessories all off, battery fully charged)THE AMPERAGE OUTAGE SHOULD BE AROUND 10 AMPS. With for example heater on headlights on and the engine running at 2000 rpm the output would typically read 25-30amps or more.



Would I use the AC or DC setting on my multimeter?

Bob,

Don't wish to appear rude but for someone who claims to have worked on and restored numerous cars I am surprised you have to ask this question.

But as my dad always said an " ignorant person is someone who does not know something you learnt 5 minutes ago" it's DC.

Hope this helps Bob,

Some people may think these figures are conservative others liberal.

Myself I have always found going for the liberal route in the end always proves to be the best way.
 

Jim Craik

Lifetime Supporter
Bob,

No need to in this case, although in your case, converting may well be the wisest thing you could do.

Nick,

Thanks, Bob appears to need a lot of help.

For a person who spends so much time here, Bob does not seem to know very much about cars.
 

Jeff Young

GT40s Supporter
Why are you playing this game with Lonesome Nutjob?

Here's what he's doing. When he decides he doesn't want to discuss the topic at hand, he asks you, Jim, a bunch of questions about cars to "expose" you as someone who is not a gearhead, and doesn't work on cars, and is here just to rabble rouse about politics.

That's what he is trying to do. Just call him on it and move on.
 

Jim Craik

Lifetime Supporter
Jeff,

I'm fully aware of LB's tactics............... call people names, change the subject and belittle folks who do not agree with him.

Everyone knows this kind of activity, we learned about it from the grammar school bullies.

You remember the bullies, they would call folks names and belittle all who they do not understand, who were "different" or they just did not like.

Bob has decided that the best way to belittle me is to try and show that I'm not really a car guy. He asks car question after car question, trying to prove that he is more worthy than I.


As the Dyslexsic kid, I have endured far more than my share of this type of activity from insucure children.

It has become aparent to all that Bob has never outgrown being a playground bully.
 
Last edited:

Doug S.

The protoplasm may be 72, but the spirit is 32!
Lifetime Supporter
Why are you playing this game with Lonesome Nutjob?

Here's what he's doing. When he decides he doesn't want to discuss the topic at hand, he asks you, Jim, a bunch of questions about cars to "expose" you as someone who is not a gearhead, and doesn't work on cars, and is here just to rabble rouse about politics.

That's what he is trying to do. Just call him on it and move on.

Jeff,

I'm fully aware of LB's tactics............... call people names, change the subject and belittle folks who do not agree with him.

Everyone knows this kind of activity, we learned about it from the grammar school bullies.

It has become aparent to all that Bob has never outgrown being a playground bully.

Calling Bob on his trolling tactics won't make him less of a troll, Jeff...but it might make you feel better for having called him out.

Jim is most likely right....from what little of his work I see, Bob seems to be a case of arrested development regarding his social skills. Playground bully would be an apt description, but IMHO Bob is taking the genre to a new level. Playground troll is more apt. I suspect he has been "lonesome" for a long, long time......:idea:

Onward thru the fog, guys.....

Cheers!

Doug
 
Dear Jim. Ever since you posted this, "Cliff is absolutely right, this is a car forum. By far majority of Cliffs posts are car related, with an occasional "paddock" discussion.

Your posts have nothing to do with cars. You only insult and devide, nothing else. You have absolutely no right to come here and pull this crap! Have you no sense of decency?" I have tried to engage you in automotive banter.

You refuse. Now you bring up an affliction I have no knowledge of. Didn't know, don't hold against you, and quite frankly you seem to have done quite well in spite of it. Which begs the question, why bring it up?







Jeff,

I'm fully aware of LB's tactics............... call people names, change the subject and belittle folks who do not agree with him.

Everyone knows this kind of activity, we learned about it from the grammar school bullies.

You remember the bullies, they would call folks names and belittle all who they do not understand, who were "different" or they just did not like.

Bob has decided that the best way to belittle me is to try and show that I'm not really a car guy. He asks car question after car question, trying to prove that he is more worthy than I.


As the Dyslexsic kid, I have endured far more than my share of this type of activity from insucure children.

It has become aparent to all that Bob has never outgrown being a playground bully.
 
Dear Doug, one day you need to cut your mother's apron strings and stop thinking with a bumper sticker mentality. With a little therapy and a whole lot of hard work, I think you can do it!!

You can do it montage. - YouTube
Calling Bob on his trolling tactics won't make him less of a troll, Jeff...but it might make you feel better for having called him out.

Jim is most likely right....from what little of his work I see, Bob seems to be a case of arrested development regarding his social skills. Playground bully would be an apt description, but IMHO Bob is taking the genre to a new level. Playground troll is more apt. I suspect he has been "lonesome" for a long, long time......:idea:

Onward thru the fog, guys.....

Cheers!

Doug

D
 
Once again, we need a recap here due to the drift of our original subject, "why you stopped posting."

1. Keith1; "I hereby label lawyer Jeff Young as The Most Forthright '40's Forum Fascist bar none."

2. David Morton; " Jeff Young seems to be the common thread that has spoiled the paddock for many people including me."

3. Al Wohlstrom; "ditto Keith
ditto David
Goodbye."

They are really gone, I hope they come back one day. I might add that there are several others who have PM'd me and will not come back to give their testimony. I know our resident psychologist/mop-rinsing analyst says I'm delusional, but he's been burned more than once on that.

On the other (LEFT) side of the ledger we have;

1. Doug Sanlair who has claimed several times to have me on ignore and yet continually posts, to this day, on threads I've started.

2. jimcraik who said, that he was quitting posting because "Bob is a prick." He refrained from posting for a couple of days but then reappeared and is posting on threads I have started.

3. cliffbeer, who really doesn't post anymore because he was banned due to fraud.

4. cliffbeer2 then mysteriously rises from the dead, saying he has ignored me (I actually had to give him a link on how to put someone on ignore), and guess what, posts frequently on threads I have started.

I'll leave the analysis of these facts to someone who hasn't been sniffing too much glue while assembling his 1/24th scale models.
 
On the other (LEFT) side of the ledger we have;

1. Doug Sanlair who has claimed several times to have me on ignore and yet continually posts, to this day, on threads I've started.

2. jimcraik who said, that he was quitting posting because "Bob is a prick." He refrained from posting for a couple of days but then reappeared and is posting on threads I have started.

3. cliffbeer, who really doesn't post anymore because he was banned due to fraud.

4. cliffbeer2 then mysteriously rises from the dead, saying he has ignored me (I actually had to give him a link on how to put someone on ignore), and guess what, posts frequently on threads I have started.

I'll leave the analysis of these facts to someone who hasn't been sniffing too much glue while assembling his 1/24th scale models.

Bob,

You forgot me :(

I have stated about three times I would leave and not darken the political paddock again. I even managed it for a week or so but stopped the medication and came back, that may be good for you were would you be without us? but not for me.

I am trying, (very trying), my willpower is weak but in my defense you certainly know which buttons to push and you enjoy pushing them, also someone once told me.

I have regretted many times my silence in the name of tact rather than speak up when some injustice was being perpetrated.

These days I speak up and to hell with whoever does not want to hear.

Dimi

Bob,

Be careful what you wish for you cause you just might get it.

Eminem - Careful What You Wish For (2009) - YouTube

Please remember.

AD Hominem,

Abusive ad hominem (also called personal abuse or personal attacks) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to attack his claim or invalidate his argument, but can also involve pointing out true character flaws or actions that are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.

Time to get back on that medication. :)
 
Last edited:
This may be of some help, Nick ;~)

"The helmets amplify frequency bands that coincide with those allocated to the US government between 1.2 Ghz and 1.4 Ghz. According to the FCC, These bands are supposedly reserved for ''radio location'' (ie, GPS), and other communications with satellites (see, for example, [3]). The 2.6 Ghz band coincides with mobile phone technology. Though not affiliated by government, these bands are at the hands of multinational corporations."

http://berkeley.intel-research.net/arahimi/helmet/
 
Bob,

I will defiantly give it a try but having worked in the Telecomms industry for a number of decades and having been zapped by radio and microwaves during that time (during both conservative and socialist terms of government) I fear it may be to late.

;)
 

Jeff Young

GT40s Supporter
It still makes me chuckle that the anti-PC, rugged individualists couldn't handle opposing viewpoints on Muslims and terrorism (Keith and David), or being questioned as to why it was ok for the poster (Al) to accept government benefits but others who did so were leaches.

Odd.


Once again, we need a recap here due to the drift of our original subject, "why you stopped posting."

1. Keith1; "I hereby label lawyer Jeff Young as The Most Forthright '40's Forum Fascist bar none."

2. David Morton; " Jeff Young seems to be the common thread that has spoiled the paddock for many people including me."

3. Al Wohlstrom; "ditto Keith
ditto David
Goodbye."

They are really gone, I hope they come back one day. I might add that there are several others who have PM'd me and will not come back to give their testimony. I know our resident psychologist/mop-rinsing analyst says I'm delusional, but he's been burned more than once on that.

On the other (LEFT) side of the ledger we have;

1. Doug Sanlair who has claimed several times to have me on ignore and yet continually posts, to this day, on threads I've started.

2. jimcraik who said, that he was quitting posting because "Bob is a prick." He refrained from posting for a couple of days but then reappeared and is posting on threads I have started.

3. cliffbeer, who really doesn't post anymore because he was banned due to fraud.

4. cliffbeer2 then mysteriously rises from the dead, saying he has ignored me (I actually had to give him a link on how to put someone on ignore), and guess what, posts frequently on threads I have started.

I'll leave the analysis of these facts to someone who hasn't been sniffing too much glue while assembling his 1/24th scale models.
 
Back
Top