Veek, listen to Rex T.: FACTS. You must stick to the facts.
The "operation" was gun walking. the Bush administration did it and called it Operation Whatever. The Obama Administration did it and called it something else. BOTH WERE GUN WALKING. Good grief man.
Ah, safe abortion for the CHILD! And that's the question isn't it? Is one cell in the womb a child? Two? Three? When does it become a person that is entitled to protection under the law? An unanswerable question, no?
And if you say it is, that means you believe EVERY cell is a human life and must be protected. Which means that every time you jerk off, you commit genocide! You Nazi!
The reality is no one can answer that question of when that mass of cells becomes "human" and a "child." The courts have tried to do so, roughly, by saying before viability, the mother gets to decide and after, the state can interfere. That makes sense to me, instead of call a sneeze or a jerk off session genocide, like you do.
Well Jeff, I'm not senile just yet but there is no reason to mock my age. I'm also not given to "jerking off" so I don't think your calling me a genocidal NAZI is nearly as appropriate as the label would apply to abortion facilitators of your political party.
As for the OBAMA gun running program, you are free to re-read my posts that clearly provide the fundamental differentiation in scope, objective, outcome and felonious cover up by the OBAMA administration from the previously DISCONTINUED Bush program.
Apparently you are also as confused as to my beliefs as you are to basic biology.
Hint: "The development of a human begins with fertilization, a process by which the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote."
[Sadler, T.W. Langman's Medical Embryology. 7th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1995, p. 3]
Disagree??? Call you doctor. Ask you Mom what she thought when she was pregnant with you. Did she consider you a baby?? A hamster??? Given the genetic similarity between a human and banana is 60%, perhaps she considered you a botanical berry. Somehow I think not.
But then you'd perhaps agree with the position presented in Oxford's 2012 Journal of Medical Ethics, which said newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. Therefore parents should be able to practice infanticide in “what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) (which) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled”. Why not???
There are times I wanted to kill both of my kids (mostly when they were in their early teens) but back in the good old days that was frowned upon.
But, to quote you House Minority Leader Ms. Pelosi, "There’s a spark of divinity in every person on earth and that we all have to recognize that. as we respect the dignity and worth of every person." I guess that's unless it's an unwanted child, or someone that's not on the Democrat voter rolls.
So what happens when actually someone survives an abortion?
Here's a presentation by one. You may find it enlightening. You decide if this person should have been allowed to live... Just a couple of cells right?
One of the best Pro-life speeches EVER! Gianna Jessen abortion survivor Full video - YouTube